Volume 5, Issue 1 (March 2023)
IEEPJ 2023, 5(1): 240-249 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jangholi F, Rahmani J, Karimian H. (2023). Determining the Dimensions and Components of the Teachers Performance Evaluation Model. IEEPJ. 5(1), 240-249. doi:10.52547/ieepj.5.1.240
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-624-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-624-en.html
1- PhD student in educational management, Qom branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tolo Mehr Institute of Higher Education, Qom, Iran ,0384459@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tolo Mehr Institute of Higher Education, Qom, Iran ,
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
Abstract: (1636 Views)
Teacher evaluation is the regular process of rating and evaluating the teaching effectiveness of educators. Teacher performance evaluations aim to help promote a better learning experience for students and foster professional growth for educators. The purpose of the current research was to determine the dimensions and components of the teacher performance evaluation model in Qom province. This research is applied in terms of purpose, which was conducted using exploratory-qualitative method and Grounded Theory (GT). The studied population includes specialists, experts, evaluators and primary teachers of Qom province in 2021. Participants were 21 people who were selected by purposeful sampling using the snowball technique. A semi-structured interview method was used to collect data. Data analysis was done using content analysis of interviews and open, axial and selective coding. The results of the research revealed that the teachers' performance evaluation model has six components, including: classroom management, innovation and creativity, ability development, communication, commitment and information technology. The findings were discussed according to the discovered components and practical implications were presented for planning and implementing policies to improve teachers' performance.
Keywords: Performance evaluation model, elementary teachers, performance evaluation components, grounded theory
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2022/08/18 | Accepted: 2022/12/14 | Published: 2023/03/1
Received: 2022/08/18 | Accepted: 2022/12/14 | Published: 2023/03/1
References
1. Ahadi, B., Seyyed Ameri, M. H., & Ahmadi, M. A. (2017). Studying the professional competence of Urmia physical education teachers based on the current and desired condition. Sport Management and Development, 6(2), 103-117. [DOI:10.22124/jsmd.2018.2720]
2. Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1), 6-14.
3. Aminbeidokhti, A., Pardakhtchi, M. H., & Aliyari, S. (2022). Assessing professional qualifications of primary school teachers. Journal of Research in Educational Science, 16(56), 34-47. http://www.jiera.ir/article_150008_e0d67a772a3f01bbb7855a9da740f15f.pdf
4. Aslam, H. D. (2011). Performance evaluation of teachers in universities: Contemporary issues and challenges. Journal of educational and social research, 1(2), 11-31.
5. Azer, S. A. (2005). The qualities of a good teacher: how can they be acquired and sustained? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98(2), 67-69. [DOI:10.1258/jrsm.98.2.67]
6. Bazargan, A., Dadras, M., & Yousefi Afrashteh, M. (2014). Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Quality of Academic Services to Students [Original]. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20(2), 73-97. http://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article-1-2351-fa.html
7. Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. (2006). Human resource management. Tata McGraw-Hill New York.
8. Cai, Y., & Lin, C. (2006). Theory and practice on teacher performance evaluation. Frontiers of Education in China, 1, 29-39. [DOI:10.1007/s11516-005-0004-x]
9. Cochran-Smith, M., Carney, M. C., Keefe, E. S., Burton, S., Chang, W.-C., Fernández, M. B., . . . Baker, M. (2018). Reclaiming accountability in teacher education. Teachers College Press.
10. Cooper, C. L. (2022). Human resource management. McGraw-Hill.
11. de Almeida, J. C. (2017). Teacher performance evaluation: The importance of performance standards. International journal for cross-disciplinary subjects in education, 8(1), 2973-2981. [DOI:10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2017.0404]
12. Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K., Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., & Merchant, K. (1990). Accounting for management control. Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-6952-1]
13. Ghaffarian Asl, S., & Osam, N. (2021). A Study of Teacher Performance in English for Academic Purposes Course: Evaluating Efficiency. SAGE Open, 11(4), 21582440211050386. [DOI:10.1177/21582440211050386]
14. Hallaji , P. D., M. (2020). An Investigation of Teachers' Characteristics based on the Implications of Ministry of Education's Strategic Plans [Research]. Quarterly Journal Of Family and Research, 17(2), 53-76. http://qjfr.ir/article-1-1500-fa.html
15. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.03.002]
16. Koçak, R. (2006). The validity and reliability of the teachers' performance evaluation scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(3), 799-808.
17. Palumbo, R., & Manna, R. (2019). Making educational organizations able to change: a literature review. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 734-752. [DOI:10.1108/IJEM-02-2018-0051]
18. Rezaa'ee, P. D., M. (2020). Identification and Validation of Teachers' Professional Competencies based on Educational Reform Documents [Research]. Quarterly Journal Of Education, 36(1), 63-82. http://qjoe.ir/article-1-2249-fa.html
19. Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H. (2009). Evaluation in organizations: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. Basic Books.
20. Salimi, J., & Abdi, A. (2018). Phenomenology of students' perception of educational elements in the university: a case study of the concept of teachers' educational "competencies". Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 6(12), 30-64. [DOI:10.22080/eps.2018.1785]
21. Sharifzadeh, S. A., Borjali, A., Eskandari, H., Farrokhi, N. A., & Sohrabi, F. (2020). Presenting a pattern for Specifying psychological characteristics in choosing of the teachers of preliminary schools. Educational Psychology, 16(57), 282-301. [DOI:10.22054/jep.2021.46550.2770]
22. Sheppard, J. (2013). Perceptions of teachers and administrators regarding the teacher evaluation process. Electronic Theses & Dissertations. Paper 852. In.
23. Sobhani Nejad, M., & Zamani Manesh, H. (2012). Identifying Dimensions of Effective Teacher and Validating its Components by High School Teachers in Yasooj. Research in Curriculum Planning, 9(32), 68-81. https://jsr-e.isfahan.iau.ir/article_534223_3b11790f893759a0e2194209563fde91.pdf
24. Stredwick, J. (2013). An introduction to human resource management. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203759455]
25. Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2009). Identifying acceptable performance appraisal criteria: An international perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 102-125. [DOI:10.1177/1038411108099292]
26. Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628-3651. [DOI:10.1257/aer.102.7.3628]
27. Xu, Y. (2012). Developing a comprehensive teaching evaluation system for foundation courses with enhanced validity and reliability. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 821-837. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-012-9240-y]
28. Yari, M., Oladian, M., & Safari, M. (2021). Provide a performance measurement model based on the document of fundamental change (Case study: Country Education Managers). Educational Leadership & administration, 15(3), 77-101. https://edu.garmsar.iau.ir/article_688053_99bf83941039399f22a553f2b129401d.pdf
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
