Volume 5, Issue 1 (March 2023)
IEEPJ 2023, 5(1): 250-258 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Salehi A, Karimian H, Sharifirad G. (2023). The Model of Knowledge Management Components Relationships using Structural Equation Modeling. IEEPJ. 5(1), 250-258. doi:10.52547/ieepj.5.1.250
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-607-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-607-en.html
1- PhD student in Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran ,hosein.karimian46@yahoo.com
3- Professor, Educational Management Department, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran ,
3- Professor, Educational Management Department, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
Abstract: (1672 Views)
The aim of the current research was to test the structural model of the relationships of knowledge management components in universities (Qom province universities) using structural equation modeling. The present study is an applied and correlation research. Participants were 247 faculty members of universities in Qom province selected via random sampling. The results of the model test showed that the effect of knowledge-oriented organizational culture, strategic planning of knowledge management, infrastructure of information and communication technology and knowledge manpower on knowledge management processes is positive and significant. The effect of knowledge management processes on knowledge-based human resource management, knowledge identification and goal setting, and knowledge team building is positive and significant. The effect of weakness in knowledge management rules and lack of motivation of employees and professors on knowledge-based human resource management, knowledge identification and goal setting, and knowledge team building is negative and significant. The effect of organizational structure and individual characteristics of employees and professors on knowledge-based human resource management, knowledge identification and goal setting, and knowledge team building is positive and significant. Finally, the impact of knowledge-based human resource management, knowledge-based identification and goal-setting and knowledge-based team building on knowledge-based universities, improving university performance, and improving individual performance is positive and significant. Findings can be used to improve knowledge management in universities.
Keywords: Knowledge management model, knowledge-oriented organizational culture, strategic planning of knowledge management, Structural Equation Modeling
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2022/08/4 | Accepted: 2022/12/14 | Published: 2023/03/1
Received: 2022/08/4 | Accepted: 2022/12/14 | Published: 2023/03/1
References
1. Adeinat, I. M., & Abdulfatah, F. H. (2019). Organizational culture and knowledge management processes: case study in a public university. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(1), 35-53. [DOI:10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2018-0041]
2. Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C., & Di Nauta, P. (2021). Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Public Organization Review, 21, 137-156. [DOI:10.1007/s11115-020-00480-7]
3. Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217-227. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018]
4. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 107-136. [DOI:10.2307/3250961]
5. Amin, A., & Shahid, M. I. (2013). Influence of language on knowledge sharing: A case study of Pakistani workers in selected Swedish multinational companies. In.
6. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
7. Donate, M. J., & de Pablo, J. D. S. (2015). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of business research, 68(2), 360-370. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.022]
8. Feiz, D., Dehghani Soltani, M., & Farsizadeh, H. (2019). The effect of knowledge sharing on the psychological empowerment in higher education mediated by organizational memory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 3-19. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2017.1328595]
9. Geisler, E., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2015). Principles of knowledge management: Theory, practice, and cases. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315686448]
10. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122. [DOI:10.1002/smj.4250171110]
11. Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford university press. [DOI:10.1093/hebz/9780198724018.001.0001]
12. Hung, Y. C., Huang, S. M., Lin, Q. P., & ‐Tsai, M. L. (2005). Critical factors in adopting a knowledge management system for the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Management & data systems, 105(2), 164-183. [DOI:10.1108/02635570510583307]
13. Liebowitz, J. (2000). Building organizational intelligence. Boca Raton, Florida.
14. Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., & Almsafir, M. K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of business research, 94, 320-334. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013]
15. Manesh, M. F., Pellegrini, M. M., Marzi, G., & Dabic, M. (2020). Knowledge management in the fourth industrial revolution: Mapping the literature and scoping future avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 289-300. [DOI:10.1109/TEM.2019.2963489]
16. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37. [DOI:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14]
17. ODell, C., & Grayson Jackson, C. (1998). If only we knew what we know now: the transfer of internal knowledge and best practice. New York. [DOI:10.2307/41165948]
18. Oztemel, E., & Arslankaya, S. (2012). Enterprise knowledge management model: a knowledge tower. Knowledge and information systems, 31, 171-192. [DOI:10.1007/s10115-011-0414-4]
19. Rotella, F., Leuzzi, F., & Ferilli, S. (2015). Learning and exploiting concept networks with ConNeKTion. Applied Intelligence, 42, 87-111. [DOI:10.1007/s10489-014-0543-z]
20. Widodo, W., & Gunawan, R. (2021). Analyzing the effect of knowledge management and teaching creativity on innovative work behavior: The organizational empowerment perspective. Management Science Letters, 11(2), 619-626. [DOI:10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.005]
21. Zaim, H., Muhammed, S., & Tarim, M. (2019). Relationship between knowledge management processes and performance: critical role of knowledge utilization in organizations. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(1), 24-38. [DOI:10.1080/14778238.2018.1538669]
22. Zand, G., Ahghar, Q., & Ahmadi, A. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management strategies, entrepreneurial skills and employee empowerment with organizational effectiveness and providing a suitable model. Educational Leadership & administration, 12(3), 141-160. https://edu.garmsar.iau.ir/article_545812_5550dbfba01e67df2f57c621e69d7aad.pdf
23. Zuber‐Skerritt, O. (2005). A model of values and actions for personal knowledge management. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 49-64. [DOI:10.1108/13665620510574450]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
