Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2023)                   IEEPJ 2023, 5(2): 119-133 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Habibi Khouzani M, Tehranian A, Behzadi M H, Alamolhodaei S H. (2023). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Game-Based Therapy and Game-Based Therapy Integrated with Cognitive Rehabilitation on the Math Performance and Attitude towards Mathematics in Students with Learning Disabilities. IEEPJ. 5(2), 119-133. doi:10.61186/ieepj.5.2.119
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-402-en.html
1- PhD Student in Mathematics Education, Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 14155/775, Tehran, Iran , Tehranian@srbiau.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Department of Statistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4- Professor, Department of Applied Mathematics, Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (839 Views)
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of game-based therapy and game-based therapy integrated with cognitive rehabilitation techniques on the math performance and attitude of students with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD). A pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design was utilized to investigate the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable, with the use of a control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of male students with MLD in third to sixth grades from a school in Khomeynishahr, Iran, in 2020. A purposive sampling method was used to select 36 students with MLD, who were randomly assigned to three groups, including an experimental group receiving game-based therapy, an experimental group receiving game-based therapy integrated with cognitive rehabilitation techniques, and a control group receiving no intervention. Shalev arithmetic disorder scale and Aiken's mathematics attitude scale were used to collect data. MANCOVA was used to test the hypotheses. The findings revealed that game-based therapy and game-based therapy integrated with cognitive rehabilitation techniques significantly improved the math performance and attitude of the students (p < 0.05). Additionally, game-based therapy integrated with cognitive rehabilitation techniques was found to be more effective in improving math performance compared to game-based therapy alone (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed between the two interventions in improving attitude (p = 0.792). Therefore, it can be concluded that integrating game-based therapy with cognitive rehabilitation techniques can be more effective than other interventions in improving the math performance of students with MLD.
Full-Text [PDF 338 kb]   (285 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Educational Psychology
Received: 2021/10/10 | Accepted: 2022/03/19 | Published: 2023/06/1

References
1. Abbariki, A., Yazdanbakhsh, K., & Momeni, K. (2017). The effectiveness of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on reducing cognitive failure in Students with Learning Disability. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 7(26), 127-157. [DOI:10.22054/jpe.2017.22223.1571]
2. Aghei, S. (2017). The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation methods of verbal and visual-spatial working memory on improving the performance of students with math learning disorders. Al-Zahra University]. Tehran.
3. Aiken Jr, L. R. (1970). Attitudes toward mathematics. Review of educational research, 40(4), 551-596. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543040004551 [DOI:10.2307/1169746]
4. Aiken, L. R. (2009). Psychological testing and assessment. Pearson Education India.
5. Ardila, A., & Rosselli, M. (2019). Cognitive rehabilitation of acquired calculation disturbances. Behavioural neurology, 2019. [DOI:10.1155/2019/3151092]
6. Barahmand, U., Narimani, M., & Amani, M. (2007). The Prevalence of Arithmetic Disorder among Elementary School Children in Ardebil [Applicable]. Journal of Exceptional Children, 6(4), 917-930. http://joec.ir/article-1-395-fa.html
7. Bigdeli, E., Abdolhoseinzadeh, A., Mohammadifar, M. A., & Rezaei, A. M. (2017). The effect of mathematic problem- solving training with playing- based method on intrinsic motivation for problem- solving in students with mathematic learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(1), 26-41. [DOI:10.22098/jld.2017.575]
8. Burrus, J., & Moore, R. (2016). The incremental validity of beliefs and attitudes for predicting mathematics achievement. Learning and individual differences, 50, 246-251. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.019]
9. Casas, A. M., De Alba, A. M., & Taverner, R. M. (2009). Habilidades matemáticas y funcionamiento ejecutivo de niños con trastorno por déficit. Psicothema, 63-69.
10. Colomeischi, A. A., & Colomeischi, T. (2015). The students 'emotional life and their attitude toward mathematics learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 744-750. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.192]
11. Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in neuroscience and education, 3(2), 63-68. [DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001]
12. Dehn, M. (2008). Working memory and academic learning. New Jerx wiley De Jony. PF (1998). Working memory deficits of reading disabelities children. Journal of experimental child psychology, 70, 75-96. [DOI:10.1006/jecp.1998.2451]
13. Gaitán, A., Garolera, M., Cerulla, N., Chico, G., Rodriguez‐Querol, M., & Canela‐Soler, J. (2013). Efficacy of an adjunctive computer‐based cognitive training program in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A single‐blind, randomized clinical trial. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 28(1), 91-99. [DOI:10.1002/gps.3794]
14. Garcia, V. L., Pereira, L. D., & Fukuda, Y. (2007). Selective attention: psi performance in children with learning disabilities. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 73, 404-411. [DOI:10.1590/S0034-72992007000300017]
15. Gartland, D., & Strosnider, R. (2020). The use of response to intervention to inform special education eligibility decisions for students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(4), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718789994 [DOI:10.1177/0731948720949964]
16. Geary, D. C. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and individual differences, 20(2), 130-133. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.008]
17. Ghasemi, N., & Ahadi, H. (2018). Investigating the growth process of problem solving skills and metacognitive strategies of children aged 3 to 11, Isfahan. Knowledge and Research in Psychology Quarterly, 15(1), 39-60.
18. Gross‐Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 38(1), 25-33. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15029.x]
19. Heidari, H., Zare, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). The effectiveness of game therapy on improvement of math concept learning and ability of problem-solving in students with learning disability in math. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(3), 57-76. [DOI:10.22098/jld.2018.627]
20. Iwanaga, R., Ozawa, H., Kawasaki, C., & Tsuchida, R. (2006). Characteristics of the sensory‐motor, verbal and cognitive abilities of preschool boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined type. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 60(1), 37-45. [DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01458.x]
21. Janeh, M., Ebrahimi Ghavam, S., & Alizadeh, H. (2012). Study of the executive functions of reasoning, planning, organizing and working memory among the students with or without mathematics disorder at primary schools in Tehran province. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 2(5), 21-42. https://jpe.atu.ac.ir/article_2134_08fc2378407b288c5900f67fa8eeb009.pdf
22. Jitendra, A. K., & Star, J. R. (2011). Meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities in inclusive mathematics classrooms: The role of schema-based instruction on mathematical problem-solving. Theory into practice, 50(1), 12-19. [DOI:10.1080/00405841.2011.534912]
23. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and individual differences, 20(2), 82-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004]
24. Karande, S., Mahajan, V., & Kulkarni, M. (2009). Recollections of learning-disabled adolescents of their schooling experiences: A qualitative study. Indian journal of medical sciences, 63(9), 382. [DOI:10.4103/0019-5359.56109]
25. Landreth, G. L. (2013). Innovations in play therapy. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203768440]
26. Lipka, O., Forkosh Baruch, A., & Meer, Y. (2019). Academic support model for post-secondary school students with learning disabilities: student and instructor perceptions. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(2), 142-157. [DOI:10.1080/13603116.2018.1427151]
27. Maehler, C., & Schuchardt, K. (2016). Working memory in children with specific learning disorders and/or attention deficits. Learning and individual differences, 49, 341-347. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.007]
28. Manouchehri Ardestani, F., Mahdipur, M., & Nasimi Far, N. (2011). The effectiveness of teaching cognitive strategies in the academic progress of fourth and fifth grade math deficiency students of Tehran primary school National conference on cognitive science findings in education and training, Tehran.
29. Mariño, M. C., Ageitos, A. G., Alvarez, J. A., del Rio Garma, M., Cendón, C. G., Castaño, A. G., & Nieto, J. P. (2018). Prevalence of neurodevelopmental, behavioural and learning disorders in paediatric primary care. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 89(3), 153-161. [DOI:10.1016/j.anpede.2017.10.005]
30. McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Basili, A. (1985). Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia. Brain and cognition, 4(2), 171-196. [DOI:10.1016/0278-2626(85)90069-7]
31. McDonald, B. A. (1989). Psychological conceptions of mathematics and emotion. Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective, 220-234. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6_15]
32. Mensah, J., Okyere, M., & Kuranchie, A. (2013). Student attitude towards mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter. Journal of education and practice, 4(3), 132-139.
33. Mohammad Ismail, E. (2004). Play therapy: theories, methods and clinical applications. Tehran: Danjeh. In.
34. Narimani, M., & Soleymani, E. (2013). The effectivenes of cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions(working memory and attention ) and academic achievement in students with math learning diworder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2(3), 91-115. https://jld.uma.ac.ir/article_129_e15b17b31b34b0538cb96dfefc3b552c.pdf
35. Narimani, M., Soleymani, E., & Tabrizchi, N. (2015). The effect of cognitive rehabilitation on attention maintenance and math achievement in ADHD students. Journal of School Psychology, 4(2), 118-134. https://jsp.uma.ac.ir/article_329_e416b164ac114de38b31b80483b9cfc1.pdf
36. Niepel, C., Burrus, J., Greiff, S., Lipnevich, A. A., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2018). Students' beliefs and attitudes toward mathematics across time: A longitudinal examination of the theory of planned behavior. Learning and individual differences, 63, 24-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.010]
37. Olson, V. E. (2002). Gender differences and the effects of cooperative learning in college level mathematics Curtin University].
38. Ota, K. R., & DuPaul, G. J. (2002). Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(3), 242. [DOI:10.1521/scpq.17.3.242.20881]
39. Pennington, B. F., McGrath, L. M., & Peterson, R. L. (2019). Diagnosing learning disorders: From science to practice. Guilford Publications.
40. Powell, S. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 94-108. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x]
41. Razavieh, A., Seif, D., & Taheri, A. M. (2005). Investigating the effect of math anxiety and attitude components on the academic progress of high school students in mathematics. Education Quarterly, 82(2), 7-19.
42. Ribner, A. D., Willoughby, M. T., Blair, C. B., & Investigators, F. L. P. K. (2017). Executive function buffers the association between early math and later academic skills. Frontiers in psychology, 869. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00869]
43. Rubinsten, O. (2015). Developmental dyscalculia: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Brain Disorders & Therapy, 4(4), 1-4. [DOI:10.4172/2168-975X.1000190]
44. Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Specific learning disabilities-from DSM-IV to DSM-5. Zeitschrift fur Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 42(5), 369-372; quiz 373. [DOI:10.1024/1422-4917/a000312]
45. Smith-Spark, J. H., Henry, L. A., Messer, D. J., Edvardsdottir, E., & Zięcik, A. P. (2016). Executive functions in adults with developmental dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 53, 323-341. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.03.001]
46. Soares, N., Evans, T., & Patel, D. R. (2018). Specific learning disability in mathematics: a comprehensive review. Translational pediatrics, 7(1), 48. [DOI:10.21037/tp.2017.08.03]
47. Taroyan, N., Nicolson, R., & Fawcett, A. (2007). Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of dyslexia in the continuous performance task. Clinical neurophysiology, 118(4), 845-855. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.273]
48. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary educational psychology, 34(1), 89-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002]
49. Walda, S. A., van Weerdenburg, M., Wijnants, M. L., & Bosman, A. M. (2014). Progress in reading and spelling of dyslexic children is not affected by executive functioning. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(12), 3431-3454. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.013]
50. Wong, C. K. (2001). Attitudes and Achievements. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5).
51. Xin, Y. P., Jitendra, A. K., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word Problem-Solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030501 [DOI:10.1177/00224669231157032]
52. Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3(1), 157-168.
53. Zhang, S., Liu, J., Wang, J., Xia, X., Zhang, L., Liu, L., & Jiang, T. (2019). Developing and validating the learning disabilities screening scale in Chinese elementary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 91-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.006]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.