Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2021)
IEEPJ 2021, 3(1): 77-93 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahimi M, Afraz S, Karimnia A. (2021). Corrective Feedback Preferences in Learning English as a Foreign Language: Providing a Validated and New Scale. IEEPJ. 3(1), 77-93. doi:10.52547/ieepj.3.1.77
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-270-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-270-en.html
1- Islamic Azad University, Qeshm branch, Qeshm, Iran
2- Assistant professor, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm branch, Qeshm, Iran , shahram.afraz1352@gmail.com
3- Islamic Azad University, Fasa branch, Fasa, Iran
2- Assistant professor, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm branch, Qeshm, Iran , shahram.afraz1352@gmail.com
3- Islamic Azad University, Fasa branch, Fasa, Iran
Abstract: (1744 Views)
The current study was an attempt to explore the underlying factor structures of the new TPCF questionnaire designed to determine EFL teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of corrective feedbacks (CFs). To this end, both male and female EFL teachers from private language institutes were conveniently selected to participate in the study. To come up with a suitable sample for construct validation (factor analysis), care was taken to select at least 125 participants (5 participants per item included in the final version of TPCF). Two research instruments were utilized in the current study including an interview and a newly designed questionnaire by the researcher. The findings revealed that underlying factor structures of the new TPCF included type of error & type of CF, time of feedback & teachers’ strategy, proficiency level & preplanning, perceived by learners, negative impression & gender difference, dominance, correction & CF enhancement. In addition, a new TPCF questionnaire was designed for EFL teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of corrective feedbacks. Eventually, the implications of the study are presented.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2020/11/8 | Accepted: 2021/02/14 | Published: 2021/03/1
Received: 2020/11/8 | Accepted: 2021/02/14 | Published: 2021/03/1
References
1. Akbar, F.S. (2017). Corrective feedback in written synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 17 (2), 9-27.
2. Budiani, A. F. (2011). The strategies of giving corrective feedback used by male and female native American teachers in the classroom. Unpublished master's thesis, Petra Christian University, Surabay.
3. Chen, S., Nassaji H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners' perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of University students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1-5. [DOI:10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y]
4. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 161-169.
5. Creswell, JW. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Deng, K. (2010). Rethinking error feedback on L2 writing. Retrieved from http://www.jalt-publications.org/proceedings/2009/.
7. Desouky, A. (2016). Effectiveness of using screencast feedback on EFL students' writing and perception. English Language Teaching, 9 (8), 106-121. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v9n8p106]
8. Diab, R. L. (2006). University students' beliefs about learning English and French in Lebanon. System, 34(1), 80-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.014]
9. Ellis, R. (1994). The studies in second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 21-35. [DOI:10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054]
11. Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184. [DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X]
12. Halimi, S. S. (2008). Indonesian teachers' and students' preferences for error correction. Wacana, 10(1), 50-71. [DOI:10.17510/wjhi.v10i1.178]
13. Hamouda, A. (2011). Study of students and teachers' preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3),128-141. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v4n3p128]
14. Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62, 387-398. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1978.tb02409.x]
15. Iraji, S., Zoghi, M., & Nemat-Tabrizi, A. (2014). Corrective feedback and learners' uptake across gender in an EFL context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 680 - 687. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.468]
16. Kartchava, E. (2016). Learners' beliefs about corrective feedback in the language classroom: perspectives from two International contexts. TESL CANADA JOURNAL, 33(2), 19-45. [DOI:10.18806/tesl.v33i2.1235]
17. Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A moral and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-304. [DOI:10.1093/elt/44.4.294]
18. Khorshidi, E., & Rassaei, E. (2013). The effects of learners' gender on their preferences for corrective feedback. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 2(2), 71-83.
19. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203832530]
20. Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144-164. [DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001]
21. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203-218. [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x]
22. Lyster, L., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,19, 37-66. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263197001034]
23. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in second language acquisition, 269-300. [DOI:10.1017/S0272263106060128]
24. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language awareness, 11(1), 43-63. [DOI:10.1080/09658410208667045]
25. Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 102-134. [DOI:10.1111/1540-4781.00205]
26. Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., & Shakiba, K. (2015). Theorizing EFL teachers' perspectives and rationales on providing corrective feedback. The Qualitative Report, 20(6), 727-745. [DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2140]
27. Rahimi, M. (2010). Iranian EFL students' perceptions and preferences for teachers' written feedback: Do students' ideas reflect teachers' practice? The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 75-98.
28. Sarandi, H., & Çelik, M. (2018). The effects of explicit recasts and output-only prompts on learning L2 grammar. H. U. Journal of Education, 1-18. [DOI:10.16986/HUJE.2018043537]
29. Shaqaqi, M., & Soleimani, H. (2019). Effects of asynchronous and conventional paper-and-pen metalinguistic feedback on L2 learners' use of verb tense. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 5(3), 55-72.
30. Vásquez, C., & Harvey, J. (2010). Raising teachers' awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 421-443. [DOI:10.1177/1362168810375365]
31. Vilček, I. (2014). Oral corrective feedback in EFL: Teachers techniques and learners' attitude. Doctoral dissertation, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Department of English Language and Literature.
32. Zhai, K., & Gao, X. (2018). Effects of corrective feedback on EFL speaking task complexity in China's university classroom. Cogent Education, 5, 1-14. [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1485472]
33. Zhang, L.J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429-439. [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
