Volume 5, Issue 3 (September 2023)
IEEPJ 2023, 5(3): 79-93 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mirgol A, keshtiaray N, Saadatmand Z. (2023). Analyzing the Discourse of Learning in Critical Pedagogy with an Emphasis on Michael Apple's Perspective. IEEPJ. 5(3), 79-93. doi:10.22034/5.3.79
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-756-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-756-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Philosophy of Education, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran ,nargeskeshtiaray2102@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran ,
3- Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract: (1463 Views)
The current study aims to scrutinize the discourse learning within the context of critical pedagogy, with a specific focus on Michael Apple's perspective. Critical pedagogy represents a relatively recent theory within the realm of school education and the learning system. It sheds light on issues of inequality, silence, exclusion, and unveils new dimensions for comprehending the intricate layers of relationships within educational institutions. This research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing Fairclough's critical discourse analysis methodology. The primary data collection method involves an extensive review of relevant literature and documents. The research primarily draws upon Michael Apple's written works, which were purposively selected for their relevance to the subject matter. The research findings indicate that the discourse generator in the learning process aspires to foster dialogue-based communication, critical learning, forward-looking, and democratic educational practices aimed at transforming individuals. Simultaneously, it aims to foster a sense of community that opposes the interests of those in positions of power and capitalism. This is achieved through the dissemination of knowledge within society and educational institutions, employing market-oriented learning, promoting intelligence-based learning, and advancing equitable educational practices, ultimately fostering the emergence of critical learners within the educational context.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Evolutionary Psychology
Received: 2023/01/16 | Accepted: 2023/08/19 | Published: 2023/09/1
Received: 2023/01/16 | Accepted: 2023/08/19 | Published: 2023/09/1
References
1. AlAfnan, M. A. (2017). Critical perspective to genre analysis: Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in electronic mail communication. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 5(01), 23. [DOI:10.4236/ajc.2017.51002]
2. Apple, M. W. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative education, 37(4), 409-423. [DOI:10.1080/03050060120091229]
3. Apple, M. W. (2013). Knowledge, power, and education: The selected works of Michael W. Apple. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203118115]
4. Armitage, A. (2011). Learning to dialogue: Towards a critical pedagogy for public finance and accounting management practice. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 9(2), 1-12.
5. Biesta, G. J., & Osberg, D. (2007). Beyond re/presentation: A case for updating the epistemology of schooling. Interchange, 38, 15-29. [DOI:10.1007/s10780-007-9015-2]
6. Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. American psychologist, 41(10), 1078. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1078]
7. Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2012). Facilitating reflective learning: Coaching, mentoring and supervision. Kogan Page Publishers.
8. Brown, D. (2011). Michael Apple, social theory, critical transcendence, and the new sociology: An essay. in education, 17(2). [DOI:10.37119/ojs2011.v17i2.79]
9. Cooke, M., & Moyle, K. (2002). Students' evaluation of problem-based learning. Nurse education today, 22(4), 330-339. [DOI:10.1054/nedt.2001.0713]
10. Doll Jr, W. E. (2012). Complexity and the culture of curriculum. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9(1). [DOI:10.29173/cmplct16530]
11. Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome: A meta‐analysis of research. Journal of research in science teaching, 20(5), 467-479. [DOI:10.1002/tea.3660200509]
12. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 3(2), 193-217. [DOI:10.1177/0957926592003002004]
13. Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse ofwelfare reform. Journal of sociolinguistics, 4(2), 163-195. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9481.00110]
14. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315834368]
15. Fazalizadeh, R., & Bagherzadeh, F. (2020). Analysis and comparison of the components of the curriculum and teaching - learning process and artistic perspective Paulo Freire and Henry Giroux. Teaching and Learning Research, 15(1), 79-94. [DOI:10.22070/tlr.2020.2522]
16. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2008). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203891414]
17. Gauthier, C., & Tardif, M. (1999). Pour ou contre un ordre professionnel des enseignantes et des enseignants au Québec? Presses Université Laval. [DOI:10.1515/9782763713007]
18. Giroux, H. A. (2004). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern/modern divide: Towards a pedagogy of democratization. Teacher education quarterly, 31(1), 31-47.
19. Keramati, E. (2023). A comparative study of socialization by hidden curricula in higher education with a focus on Apple and King's viewpoint: a case study of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad and Arizona State University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20(4), 145-172.
20. Kincheloe, J. (2008). Questions of Power and Knowledge. Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction, 97-115. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-8224-5_5]
21. Kridel, C. (2010). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (Vol. 1). Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781412958806]
22. Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., & Miller, T. R. (2019). Social equity in urban resilience planning. Local Environment, 24(9), 793-808. [DOI:10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103]
23. Miller, R. (2002). Free schools, free people: Education and democracy after the 1960s. SUNY Press.
24. Mohammadi, H., & Zibakalam, F. (2019). Neoliberalism and the Rise of "Accountability" in University: A Reflection on the Approach to University as a Quasi-market Institution. 12(47), 127-149. [DOI:10.22034/jsfc.2019.103797]
25. Murphy, M. M. (2015). Plato's Philosophy of Education and the Common Core Debate. Online Submission.
26. Qaidi, Y., Boshdari, R., & Bostan, K. (2018). Studying educational evaluation based on critical theory with emphasis on Henry Giraud and Michael Apple. Khwarazmi University]. Tehran.
27. Radji, M. (2013). Critical Education: How does it Connect with Teaching Philosophy for Children Program? Thinking and Children, 3(5), 15-42. https://fabak.ihcs.ac.ir/article_546_2d08fbb43128723e9fddddd8704639c1.pdf
28. Ross, E. W. (2016). Broadening the circle of critical pedagogy. Working for social justice inside and outside the classroom: A community of students, teachers, researchers, and activists, 209-218.
29. Sharifi Darzadeh, M., Nateghi, F., & Rezaei, M. H. (2019). Analyzing the role of critical theory in the curriculum and drawing a model of a transformative teacher. Educational Leadership & administration, 13(1), 141-156. https://edu.garmsar.iau.ir/article_665968_c17decef93de5c35c62a66be2d982ee1.pdf
30. Sohbatlo, A., & Mirzamohammadi, M. (2015). Review Over Critical Thory in Education. 1(2), 94-110. https://phe.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_1853_d07bfc7babef84e3dae02a71fa47d139.pdf
31. Todd, E. M., Torrence, B. S., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Effective practices in the delivery of research ethics education: A qualitative review of instructional methods. Accountability in research, 24(5), 297-321. [DOI:10.1080/08989621.2017.1301210]
32. Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of educational research, 79(2), 702-739. [DOI:10.3102/0034654308330970]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
