1. Aghakasiri, Z., Abdollahi, M., & Taghizadeh, A. (2016). Teaching based on the constructivist design model of the e-learning environment. The 11th Conference on E-learning. Iran, Tehran: Payam Noor University.
2. Al-Qahtani, A. A.Y., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students' achievement in higher education, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 220-234. https://doi.org /10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x [
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x]
3. Björk, E., Ottosson, S., & Thorsteinsdottir, S. (2008). E-Learning for all. In: E-Learning: 21st Century Issues and Challenges, Eds: A.R. Lipshitz and S.P. Parsons Chapter 3, 49-70.
4. Brown, T.H. (2003). The role of m-learning in the future of e-learning in Africa, presentation at the 21 st ICDE world conference Hong Kong, June.
5. Carman, J. (2002). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Journal of Educational Technology & society. 3.
6. Catanzaro, M. (1988). Using qualitative analytical techniques. In Nursing Research; Theory and Practice (Woods P. & Catanzaro, M., eds), C.V. Mosby Company, New York, pp. 437-456.
7. Cheraghmollaei, L. (2014). Instructional Design based on virtual social networks and its impact on students' constructivist learning. PhD Thesis of Educational Psychology. Unpublished. Kharazmi University.
8. Choi, M. Y., & Han, T. I. (2015). A Comparison of Learning Effectiveness in Face to face versus Blended Learning of TOEIC. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(10), 517-525. https:// doi.org /10. 14400 /JDC .2015.13.10.517. [
DOI:10.14400/JDC.2015.13.10.517]
9. Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning: an experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 518-529. https:// doi.org /10.1111 /jcal.12009 [
DOI:10.1111/jcal.12009]
10. Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended Learning: Let's get beyond the hype, Learning and Training Innovations News line. Retrieved Oct 5.
11. Ebrahimi, S., Karami, M., Ahanchian, M., & Mosannen, P. (2012). Applying Constructivism Theory to Web-Based Learning in Organizations: A Step towards Effective Human Resource Management. The Conference on Modern Management Sciences, Gorgan.
12. Ezzatzadeh, M., Rabie, A., Farhangi, A., & Soltanifar, M. (2016). Identifying and Ranking of Social Network Success in Their Educational Roles from View of Media Elites. Socio-Cultural Research Journal of Rahbord, 5(17), 95-112. Available: https://www.sid.ir /fa/journal/ View Paper .aspx?id= 270140.
13. Fardanesh, H. (2009). A Classification of Constructivist Instructional Design Models based on Learning and Teaching Approaches. Foundations of Education, 17(34), 5-22. Available: https://www.sid.ir /fa/ journal / ViewPaper.aspx? Id=96919.
14. Grabinger, S., Aplin, C., Ponnappa_Brenner, G. (2007). Instructional Design for sociocultural learning environment. Journal of instructional Science and technology, 10(1).
15. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
16. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (3), 23-48. http://dx .doi. org/ 10.1007/BF02319856 [
DOI:10.1007/BF02319856]
17. Jacobsen, W., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.14 (5), 275-80. [
DOI:10.1089/cyber.2010.0135]
18. Javadinia, A., Arfanian, M., Abedini, M., & Bijari, B. (2012). The impact of virtual social networks on the performance of students in Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 12(8), 597-606. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1994-fa.html
19. Javid, S., Sadri, R., Salarzahi, H., & Noroozi Cheshmeali, E. (2017). Negative Consequences of Misusing the Virtual Social Media with the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Approach (Case Study: Sistan and Baloochestan University Student's View). Iranian Journal of Culture in the Islamic University, 7(23), 227-240. http://ciu.nahad.ir/article_441.html.
20. Jonassen, D. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments, ETR8-D, 46(1), 61-79. [
DOI:10.1007/BF02299477.]
21. Kadivar, P. (2013). The Psychology of Learning from Theory to Practice. Tehran: SAMT
22. Kamar, N., & Ong'ondo, M. (2007). Challenge of M- learning on social change. Egerton University. Available at: http://www.vs. informatik, uni-ulm.de/DE/intra/bib/2007/IMCL/76_Final_paper.pdf.
23. Koohang, A. (2009). A learner-centered model for blended learning design. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(1), 76-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2009.021685. [
DOI:10.1504/IJIL.2009.021685]
24. Krasnova, T. (2015). A paradigm shift: Blended learning integration in Russian higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 399-403. http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35420. [
DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.543]
25. Lai, K. (1999). Teaching, Learning, and Professional Development: The Teacher Matters Most. In Lai, K. (Ed.). Networking: Teaching, Learning & Professional Development with the Internet. (pp. 7-24). New Zealand: Univ. of Otago Press.
26. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist Values for Instructional Systems Design: Five Principles toward a New Mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 3(41), 4-16. https://doi. org/ 10. 1007 / BF02297354 [
DOI:10.1007/BF02297354]
27. Liu, C.C., Tao, S.Y., & Nee, J.N. (2008b). Bridging the gap between students and computers: supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network. Behavior & Information Technology, 27 (2), 127-137. [
DOI:10.1080/01449290601054772.]
28. Macdonald, J. (2007). Blended learning and online tutoring. Planning Learner Support and Activity design.
29. Mayring, PH. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis, Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https:// doi. org /10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
30. Mohkamkar, I., & Hallaj, M. M. (2014). What are social networks looking for? North Khorasan police knowledge, 1(2), 87-108.
31. ON, Iloanusi., Ogechukwu, N. (2007). Blended Learning in High Schools and Tertiary Institutions, 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, University of Nigeria.
32. Peters, K. (2007). M-learning Positioning Educators for a Mobile, Connected Future Reproduced with permission of Athabasca University Canada's Open University, Original published in the International Review on Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 8(2). http:// dx.doi. org /10. 19173 /irrodl. v8i2.350 [
DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.350]
33. Petty, N. J., Thomson, O. P., & Stew, G. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy, 17, 378-384. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1016 /j. math. 2012.03.004 [
DOI:10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004]
34. Saif, A. (2015). Modern Educational Psychology. Tehran: doran.
35. Sarmadi, M., Veisi Tabar, S. (2014). Designation of Web-based Learning Focusing on Constructivism Epistemology. TLR. 2014; 2 (4), 129-147. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal.
36. Sponcil, M., & Gitimu, P. (2013). Use of social media by college students: Relationship to communication and self-concept. Journal of Technology Research, (4), 1-13. https:// www.aabri.com/html.
37. Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Infosight Institute. Retrieved from: http://1.usa.gov/1rU4Oq6.
38. Stollak, M., Vandenberg, A., Burklund, A., & Weiss, S. (2011). Editor getting social: The impact of social networking usage on grades among college students. Proceeding of the ASBBS Annual Conference; 2011 February 11; Las vegas, 18(1), 859-65.
39. Swoboda, A., & Feiler, L. (2016). Measuring the Effect of Blended Learning: Evidence from a Selective Liberal Arts College. The American Economic Review, 106(5), 368-372. http://dx .doi.org/10. 1257/aer.p 20161055. [
DOI:10.1257/aer.p20161055]
40. Toofaninejad, E., Zaraii Zavaraki. E., Sharifi Daramadi, P., Dawson, S., Nili Ahmadabadi, M., & Delavar, A. (2018). Designing and Validating of Learning Environment Enriched by Virtual Social Network Instructional Model for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 8(29), 1-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2018.28895.1705.
41. Volvi, P. (2013). Constructivism, a New Approach to Education. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University.
42. Willis, J. (1995). A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology, 35 (6), 5-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44428302.
43. Wills, J. (2009). Constructivist Instructional Design (C-ID), Foundations, Models and Examples; Library of congress cataloging-in-publication Data.
44. Yang, H. H., Zhu, S., & MacLeod, J. (2016). Collaborative Teaching Approaches: Extending Current Blended Learning Models. In International Conference on Blending Learning (pp. 49-59). Springer International Publishing. [
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-41165-1_5]
45. Zenger, A., & Uehlei, C. (2001). Why blended will win. Journal of Training & development, 55(2), 54-59.