Volume 6, Issue 2 (June 2024)
IEEPJ 2024, 6(2): 333-350 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khabbaz Azar F, Seifoori Z, Ahangari S. (2024). EFL Learners’ Perception of Their Teacher's Immediate Behavior (Verbal/ Non Verbal) and Their Communication Apprehension across Gender. IEEPJ. 6(2), 333-350.
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-753-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-753-en.html
1- PhD Candidate, Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,Zseifoori2005@yahoo.com
3- Associate professor, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Associate professor, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (2238 Views)
Objective: Achieving mastery of English in foreign language learning contexts is a daunting task for many EFL learners whose exposure to the target language is highly restricted and dominantly influenced by communication apprehension (CA). What may either deteriorate or ameliorate learners’ CA can be their perception of their teachers’ immediacy (TI) or the extent to which their teacher is accessible verbally and nonverbally. TI might be subject to individual variations like gender and is significant with regard to the impact it may exert on classroom atmosphere and learners’ CA.
Methods: The present ex post facto correlational study set out to explore Iranian EFL learners’ CA in relation to their perception of their male and female teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy. To this end, a purposive sample of 210 EFL learners in 30 classes taught by 30 teachers, including 17 females and 13 males, were selected from different English language institutes in Tabriz, Iran. The research data were gleaned through Personal Report of CA (PRCA) questionnaire and TI questionnaire comprising Nonverbal Immediacy and Verbal Immediacy (VI) scales to measure the participants’ level of CA and their perception of teachers’ VI and NVI. The research data were analyzed via MANOVA, an independent samples t-test, and linear regression.
Results: The results revealed no significant difference in the participants’ CA taught by male and female teachers; it was also found that TI could not predict the participants’ CA.
Conclusions: By broadening the scope of investigation, educators can gain a more comprehensive understanding of how to effectively support language learners in overcoming communication barriers.
Methods: The present ex post facto correlational study set out to explore Iranian EFL learners’ CA in relation to their perception of their male and female teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy. To this end, a purposive sample of 210 EFL learners in 30 classes taught by 30 teachers, including 17 females and 13 males, were selected from different English language institutes in Tabriz, Iran. The research data were gleaned through Personal Report of CA (PRCA) questionnaire and TI questionnaire comprising Nonverbal Immediacy and Verbal Immediacy (VI) scales to measure the participants’ level of CA and their perception of teachers’ VI and NVI. The research data were analyzed via MANOVA, an independent samples t-test, and linear regression.
Results: The results revealed no significant difference in the participants’ CA taught by male and female teachers; it was also found that TI could not predict the participants’ CA.
Conclusions: By broadening the scope of investigation, educators can gain a more comprehensive understanding of how to effectively support language learners in overcoming communication barriers.
Keywords: Communication Apprehension, Gender, Teacher Immediacy, Nonverbal Immediacy, Verbal Immediacy
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2023/08/14 | Accepted: 2023/12/4 | Published: 2024/06/1
Received: 2023/08/14 | Accepted: 2023/12/4 | Published: 2024/06/1
References
1. Andersen, P. & Andersen, J. (1982). Non-verbal immediacy instructions. In communications in the classroom . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3. Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 248-287. [DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L]
4. Beatty, M. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Heisel, A. D. (1998). Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. Communications Monographs, 65(3), 197-219. [DOI:10.1080/03637759809376448]
5. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Grandpre, J., & Kalbfleisch, P. (1998). Sex differences in presenting and detecting deceptive messages. In D. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 351-372). Mahwah, NJ: LEA. [DOI:10.4324/9781315805870-15]
6. Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 31-40. [DOI:10.1080/03634529909379150]
7. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education Reports, 50(1), 59-68. [DOI:10.1080/03634520109379232]
8. Christophel, D. M., (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340. [DOI:10.1080/03634529009378813]
9. Coates, E. J. (1996). Nonverbal expressions of emotion: Two models of gender and status differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA.
10. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50(3), 145-158. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145]
11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. Sage Publications Ltd
12. Foo, A. (2015). Communication Apprehension and Temperament: A Communibiological Perspective in Accounting Education. Master's thesis, UTAR.
13. Gendrin, D. M., & Rucker, M. L. (2009). The impact of gender on teacher immediacy and student learning in the HBCU classroom. Communication Research Reports 19(3), 291-299. [DOI:10.1080/08824090209384857]
14. Gorham, J., (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53. [DOI:10.1080/03634528809378702]
15. Hussain, T., Khalid, M., & Akbar, F. (2020). Teacher immediacy and students classroom participation: a relationship study in Pakistan. J. Res. Soc. 57, 436-446.
16. immediacy: a study of its detriments and consequences. Eur. J. Educat. Stud. 63, 398-409.
17. Jacopsen, S.K., (2009). Communication skills for conservation professional. Washington: Island Press.
18. Kalat, F. L., Yazdi, Z. A., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2018). EFL teachers' verbal and nonverbal
19. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20. Kumaravadivelu, B., (2006). Understanding language teaching. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [DOI:10.4324/9781410615725]
21. Lantolf, J. P., (2005). Sociocultural and second language learning research: An exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 335-354). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Lee, J. H. (2020). Relationships among students' perceptions of native and nonnative EFL teachers' immediacy behaviours and credibility and students' willingness to communicate in class. Oxford Rev. Educ. 46, 153-168. [DOI:10.1080/03054985.2019.1642187]
23. McCroskey, J. C. (1977), Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research [electronic version]. Human communication research, 4, 78-96. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00599.x]
24. McCroskey, J. C., (1978). Validity of PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension. Retrieved from: www.emeraldinsight.com/ Insight/html/Output/Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Pdf/0500150104_ref.html [DOI:10.1080/03637757809375965]
25. McCroskey, J., & Anderson, J. (1976). Communication apprehension and academic achievement. Human Communication Research, 3(1), 73-81. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00506.x]
26. McCroskey, J.C., (1982). An introduction to rhetorical communication . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 359-372. [DOI:10.1037/h0027349]
28. Mehrabian, A., (1971). Verbal and nonverbal interaction of strangers in a waiting situation. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 127-138.
29. Mehrabian, A., (1976). The three dimensions of emotional reaction. Psychology Today, 10 (3), 57-61.
30. Mentoor, Z., M. (2015). An analysis of the relationship between communication skills, communication apprehension and academic achievement of secondary phase learners. Dissertation at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University.
31. Moore, R., Jensen, M., Hatch, J., Duranczyk, I., Staats, S., & Koch, L. (2003). Showing up: the importance of class attendance for academic success in introductory science courses. Am. Biol. Teach. 65, 325-329. [DOI:10.2307/4451508]
32. Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., & Zhaleh, K. (2019). The interplay of teacher success, credibility, and stroke with respect to EFL students' willingness to attend classes. Polish Psychol. Bull. 284-292. [DOI:10.24425/ppb.2019.131001]
33. Rashidi, N., & Mahmoudi Kia, M. (2012) The effect of teachers' immediacy on Iranian students' willingness to communicate (WTC) in EFL classroom. International Symposium on Language and Communication: Research Trends and Challenges (ISLC), Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
34. Rashidi, N., Yamini, M., & Shafiei, E. (2011). Oral communication apprehension and affective factors: Self-esteem and introversion/extroversion. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 5(7), 145-174.
35. Richmond, V. P., & McCroksey, J. C., (1995). Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal relations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Hickson, M. (2008). Non-verbal behavior in interpersonal relations. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
37. Roach, K.D. (1999), The influence of teaching assistants' willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in the classroom, Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 166-82. [DOI:10.1080/01463379909370132]
38. Rowden, G. V., & Carlson, R. E. (1996). Gender issues and students' perceptions of instructors' immediacy and evaluation of teaching and course. Psychological Reports, 78 (3), 835-839. [DOI:10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3.835]
39. Segal, E. A., (2011). Social empathy: A model built on empathy, contextual understanding, and social responsibility that promote social justice. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(3), 266-277. [DOI:10.1080/01488376.2011.564040]
40. Sheybani, M. (2019). The relationship between EFL Learners' willingness to communicate (WTC) and their teacher immediacy attributes: a structural equation modelling. Cogent Psychol. 6, 1-14. [DOI:10.1080/23311908.2019.1607051]
41. Sutiyatno, S. (2018). The effect of teacher's verbal communication and non-verbal communication on students' English achievement. J. Language Teach. Res. 9, 430-437. [DOI:10.17507/jltr.0902.28]
42. Tiona, Nani, I. & Sylvia, A. (2004). The types of communication strategies used by speaking class students with different communication apprehension levels in English department of Petra Christian University, Surabaya, 6(1), 30-39.
43. Violanti, M. T., Kelly, S. E., Garland, M. E., and Christen, S. (2018). Instructor clarity, humor, immediacy, and student learning: Replication and extension. Commun. Stud. 69, 251-262. [DOI:10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718]
44. Witt, P. L., Schrodt, P., Wheeless, V. E., & Bryand, M. C., (2014). Students' intent to persist in college: Moderating the negative effects of receiver apprehension with instructor credibility and nonverbal immediacy. Communication Studies, 65 (3), 330-352. [DOI:10.1080/10510974.2013.811428]
45. Zhang, Q. (2005) Immediacy, humor, power distance, and classroom communication apprehension in Chinese college classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53(1), 109-124. [DOI:10.1080/01463370500056150]
46. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. [DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
