Volume 6, Issue 3 (September 2024)
IEEPJ 2024, 6(3): 179-198 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nozad K, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, Maghasedi M, Rasouli H. (2024). Interpolation Polynomial Approximation for the Optimal Teaching of Employing Educational Technologies in Traditional Education of Mathematics. IEEPJ. 6(3), 179-198.
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-720-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-720-en.html
1- Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,mrostamy@srbiau.ac.ir
3- Department of Mathematics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Mathematics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
Abstract: (2595 Views)
Objective: In this paper, after having examined the concept of learning, we analyzed mathematics education using educational applications.
Methods: First, the stages of learning introduced. Next, learning stages are considered for the two modes of traditional method of mathematics education and using technology in the traditional education. These two methods were employed for different educational classes in some high schools of Karaj city. The data acquired were analyzed using data envelopment analysis.
Results: The inputs are traditional mathematics education and education through employing technology. The output is the four learning stages, which is also the second phase input. Learning is the output of the second phase.
Conclusions: we achieved an optimal ratio of using both methods in an educational class. Finally, we achieved an optimal ratio of employing both methods in a course and we find the internal polynomial.
Methods: First, the stages of learning introduced. Next, learning stages are considered for the two modes of traditional method of mathematics education and using technology in the traditional education. These two methods were employed for different educational classes in some high schools of Karaj city. The data acquired were analyzed using data envelopment analysis.
Results: The inputs are traditional mathematics education and education through employing technology. The output is the four learning stages, which is also the second phase input. Learning is the output of the second phase.
Conclusions: we achieved an optimal ratio of using both methods in an educational class. Finally, we achieved an optimal ratio of employing both methods in a course and we find the internal polynomial.
Keywords: Learning, incompetence, Competence, Consciously, Unconsciously, Traditional mathematics, Educational technology, Data envelopment analysis
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2023/06/2 | Accepted: 2023/10/21 | Published: 2024/09/1
Received: 2023/06/2 | Accepted: 2023/10/21 | Published: 2024/09/1
References
1. A Anderson, WT Seah, (2013). Facilitating mathematics Learning in different contexts: The values perspective, proceedings of the seventh International mathematics education and society conference (MES7), 193- 202, Africa.
2. A Barzegarinegad, G Jahanshahloo, M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, (2014). A full ranking for decision making units using ideal and anti-ideal points in DEA, The Scientific World Journal 2014. [DOI:10.1155/2014/282939]
3. A Bishop, (2002). Mathematical acculturation, cultural conflicts and transition, Transitions between contexts of mathematical practices, 193-212, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Kluwer Academic publishers. [DOI:10.1007/0-306-47674-6_10]
4. A Bishop, (2007). values in mathematics and science education. Mathematician and de Mathematician. social philosophical, and educational ramifications, 123-139. Rotterdam, The Netherlands,sense publishers. [DOI:10.1163/9789460911439_009]
5. A Bishop, (2008) Mathematical enculturation. A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Boston, MA. Kluwer Academic publishers.
6. A Loukas & SH Robinson, (2004). examining the Moderating Role of perceived school climate in Eerty Adolescent Adjustment, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(2), 209 -233. [DOI:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.01402004.x]
7. A Vitman, (2002). Teaching for understanding. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice. London, UK: Routledge Falmer, 153-162.
8. A Watson, (2002). Teaching for understanding. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice (pp.162). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
9. B Bloom, (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world (executive summary). Retrieved fromwww.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/1.
10. C Papanastasiou, (2000). Effects of Attitudes and Beliefs on mathematics achievement, studies in Educational Evaluation, 26 (1), 27-42. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00004-3]
11. D Uzel & SM Uyangor, (2006). Attitudes of 7th class tudent stoward mathematics in realistic mathematics education International Mathematics Forum. 1, No 39, 1951-1959. [DOI:10.12988/imf.2006.06172]
12. Elahe Aminifar, Technology and the improvement of mathematics education at the tertiary level, (2007 )- ro.uow.edu.au.
13. E Aminifar, Technology and the improvement of mathematics education at the tertiary level, University of Wollongong, https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses.
14. E Haghi, M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, MH Behzadi, A Shahvarani, (2020). Performance evaluation of schools' math education from a cultural, social and economic point of view by data envelopment analysis modeling, Measurement and Control 53 (3-4), 454-460, 2020. [DOI:10.1177/0020294019877523]
15. F H Lotfi, M Navabakhs, A Tehranian, M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, (2007). Ranking bank branches with interval data-the application of DEA. International Mathematical Forum 2 (9), 429-440. [DOI:10.12988/imf.2007.07039]
16. GR Jahanshahloo & M Soleimani-damaneh, (2006) On the Pareto (dynamically) efficient paths. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 83, 629-633. [DOI:10.1080/00207160601056099]
17. GR Jahanshahloo, F Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, (2014). Using enhanced Russell model to solve inverse data envelopment analysis problems. The Scientific World Journal 2014. [DOI:10.1155/2014/571896]
18. MA Dezfuli, H Akbari and E Yousefi, (2020). Application of concept map and V diagram in volume determination using integral. http://jnrm.srbiau.ac.ir, (2020), 33-40.
19. M H Behzadi, FH Lotfi, N Mahboudi, (2014). The study of teaching effective strategies on student's math achievements, Mathematics Education Trends and Research,academia.edu, 2014, 1-8 [DOI:10.5899/2014/metr-00040]
20. M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, E Mollaeian,(2012). Evaluating performance supply chain by a new non-radial network DEA model with fuzzy data, Science 9, 2012 [DOI:10.5899/2012/dea-00005]
21. M Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, (2000). Mathematics education in The Netherlands: A guided tour. Retrieved from http://www.fi.uu.nl/en.
22. P Broken, D Fsher, T Richards, & E Bull, (2006) Californian Science students perceptions of Their classroom learning environments, Educational Research and Evaluations, 12 (1),3-25. [DOI:10.1080/13803610500392053]
23. R Puran, MH Behzadi, A Shahvarani, FH Lotfi, (2017). The Effects of Training and Other Factors on Problem Solving in Students.European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2017, 6(3). [DOI:10.13187/ejced.2017.3.448]
24. S Mafakheri, M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh , A Shahvarani and MH Behzadi, (2013). The study of effect of the main factors on problem solving self-confidence using cooperative learning. Mathematics Education Trends and Research (2013) 1-7. [DOI:10.5899/2013/metr-00023]
25. S Mafakheri, M Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, A Shahvarani, MH Behzadi, (2013). The study of effect of the main factors on problem solving self-confidence using cooperative learning, Mathematics Education Trends and Research Journal 23, 2013 [DOI:10.5899/2013/metr-00023]
26. S S Salout1, M H Behzadi1, A Shahvarani and M Manuchehri,(2013). Student's conception about the relation of mathematics to real-life, Mathematics Education Trends and Research (2013) 1-7. [DOI:10.5899/2013/metr-00009]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
