Volume 4, Issue 4 (December 2022)
IEEPJ 2022, 4(4): 252-259 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nesari K, Rahmani J, Sharifi Rad G. (2022). Examining a Professional Competency Model for Teachers in the E-Learning Environment. IEEPJ. 4(4), 252-259. doi:10.52547/ieepj.4.4.252
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-628-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-628-en.html
1- PhD student in Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2- Department of Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran , 0384459@gmail.com
3- Department of Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2- Department of Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran , 0384459@gmail.com
3- Department of Educational Management, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
Abstract: (667 Views)
The current study aimed to provide a model of professional competency of teachers in the e-learning environment. The research method was correlational, and the data was analyzed using structural equation modeling. The statistical population included all male and female elementary school teachers in Qom city that 375 of whom were selected by stratified random sampling method. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated at a satisfactory level. Results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that seven dimensions of professional competency of teachers in the e-learning environment were confirmed. According to the results, these dimensions include educational (pedagogical), social, evaluation, technological, organizational, ethical and individual dimensions. Also, the model fit indices showed that the research model benefited from a good fit. Correspondingly, the model of professional competence of teachers in the electronic learning environment includes seven dimensions and 16 components. The findings can be used in the design of plans to improve the professional competence of teachers in e-learning environments.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2022/07/24 | Accepted: 2022/10/6 | Published: 2022/12/1
Received: 2022/07/24 | Accepted: 2022/10/6 | Published: 2022/12/1
References
1. Alipour, N., Noroozi, D., & Nourian, M. (2021). Designing a model of components affecting the quality of e-learning environments. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(3), 503-518. [DOI:10.22061/tej.2021.7167.2505]
2. Alqahtani, N., Innab, A., & Bahari, G. (2021). Virtual education during COVID-19: Exploring factors associated with e-learning satisfaction among Saudi nursing students. Nurse educator, 46(2), E18-E22. [DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000954]
3. Chamorro-Atalaya, O., Morales-Romero, G., Quispe-Andía, A., Trinidad-Loli, N., Caycho-Salas, B., León-Velarde, C., & Gamarra-Mendoza, S. (2021). Distance education and student satisfaction regarding the pedagogical support services provided in virtual teaching-learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(20), 255-262. [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v16i20.24559]
4. Egan, T. M., & Akdere, M. (2005). Clarifying distance education roles and competencies: Exploring similarities and differences between professional and student-practitioner perspectives. The American journal of distance education, 19(2), 87-103. [DOI:10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_3]
5. Elfaki, N. K., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on student's performance and attitude. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 8(10), 76-82.
6. Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199-206. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018]
7. Hermanto, Y. B., & Srimulyani, V. A. (2021). The challenges of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 54(1), 46-57. [DOI:10.23887/jpp.v54i1.29703]
8. Hoernke, K., McGrath, H., Teh, J. Q., & Salazar, O. (2020). Virtual learning innovations for continuing clinical education during COVID-19. Medical science educator, 30(4), 1345-1346. [DOI:10.1007/s40670-020-01090-0]
9. Karuović, D., Tasić, I., Hains, V. V., Glušac, D., Namestovski, Z., Szabo, C., . . . Milanov, D. (2021). Students' habits and competencies for creating virtual learning environments. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 864-882. [DOI:10.1002/cae.22312]
10. khademi, y., & sattari, s. (2021). Evaluation and Prioritization of types of Interaction and Participation in E-learning Environment using Hierarchical Analysis Process (AHP). Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 11(3), 87-107.
11. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222. [DOI:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092]
12. Moh'd Al-Assaf, D. (2021). Challenges of distance learning in language classes: Based on the experience of distance teaching of Arabic to non-native speakers in light of the Coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 444-451. [DOI:10.17507/jltr.1203.15]
13. Mok, K. H., Xiong, W., & Bin Aedy Rahman, H. N. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic's disruption on university teaching and learning and competence cultivation: Student evaluation of online learning experiences in Hong Kong. International Journal of Chinese Education, 10(1), 221258682110070. [DOI:10.1177/22125868211007011]
14. Nasrollahi, M. (2016). Identify and prioritize the factors affecting trends in e-learning teachers. Technology of Instruction and Learning, 2(7), 81-105. [DOI:10.22054/jti.2019.12933.1159]
15. Ramezanpour, E., pourkarimi, j., Fatemi, S. O., & Masoumi, D. (2021). Providing a Meta-Synthesis Model of Competencies of E-Learning Courses Instructors. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 11(4), 5-25.
16. Rochefort, B., & Richmond, N. (2011). Connecting instruction to connected technologies-why bother? An instructional designer's perspective. RUSC, Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 8(1), 217-232. [DOI:10.7238/rusc.v8i1.942]
17. Subaih, R. H. A., Sabbah, S. S., & Al-Duais, R. N. E. (2021). Obstacles facing teachers in Palestine while implementing e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Social Science, 17(4), 44-45. [DOI:10.5539/ass.v17n4p44]
18. Torres Martín, C., Acal, C., El Homrani, M., & Mingorance Estrada, Á. C. (2021). Impact on the virtual learning environment due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(2), 582. [DOI:10.3390/su13020582]
19. Winter, E., Costello, A., O'Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers' use of technology and the impact of Covid-19. Irish educational studies, 40(2), 235-246. [DOI:10.1080/03323315.2021.1916559]
20. Yustina, Y., Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning and Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Creative Thinking through Online Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408-420. [DOI:10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
