Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2024)                   IEEPJ 2024, 6(1): 256-266 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farsi A, Rahmani J, Saadatmand Z. (2024). Criticism and Philosophical Analysis of Shahab National Project (Multiple Intelligence) for Primary School Students. IEEPJ. 6(1), 256-266. doi:10.22034/6.1.256
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-594-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Philosophy of Education, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran , jahanrah.575@gmail.com
3- Associate professor, Department of Curriculum planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (2637 Views)
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and scrutinize the ideology behind the Shahab national program (multiple intelligence) among primary school students.
Methods: The methodology employed is pragmatic in its objectives and descriptive-analytical in its approach to data collection, utilizing surveys and post-event analyses. The target population for this study encompassed all primary school students in Isfahan province during the academic year of 2022. By employing cluster sampling and the Cochran formula, a sample size of 250 individuals was determined. The instrument utilized for data collection in this study was the Gardner multiple intelligences questionnaire comprising 80 items.
Results: The findings indicated that according to the participants, the strengths and weaknesses of the national Shahab program have a significant impact and were deemed acceptable and conventional. As per the respondents of the Fundamental Transformation of Education document, the fostering of talents contributes to the unique abilities and individual variances among students. The participants also noted the significance of nurturing the exceptional abilities of elementary school students.
Conclusions: The results typically offer school planners and counselors the essential understanding and perspective to recognize and support exceptional abilities 
Full-Text [PDF 228 kb]   (831 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Evolutionary Psychology
Received: 2022/10/24 | Accepted: 2022/03/17 | Published: 2024/03/1

References
1. Abdi, A. (2016). Comparison of the effectiveness of teaching strategy based on multiple intelligences and conventional method on academic progress and attitude in science lessons of fifth grade female students in the three districts of Kermanshah Allameh Tabatabaei University]. Tehran.
2. Abdi, A., Laei, S., & Ahmadyan, H. (2013). The Effect of Teaching Strategy Based on Multiple Intelligences on Students' Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 281-284. [DOI:10.13189/ujer.2013.010401]
3. Atkin, A. L., Yoo, H. C., Jager, J., & Yeh, C. J. (2018). Internalization of the model minority myth, school racial composition, and psychological distress among Asian American adolescents. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 108. [DOI:10.1037/aap0000096]
4. Baum, S. M. (2023). Talent Centered Model for twice exceptional students. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 17-48). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003419426-2]
5. Caputo, A., Ayoko, O. B., & Amoo, N. (2018). The moderating role of cultural intelligence in the relationship between cultural orientations and conflict management styles. Journal of business research, 89, 10-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.042]
6. Cavas, B., & Cavas, P. (2020). Multiple intelligences theory-Howard Gardner. Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory, 405-418. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_27]
7. CheraghMollaei, L. (2018). Design the model and Monitoring SHAHAB program Provincial Teacher Training Course. Educational Psychology, 14(47), 25-47. [DOI:10.22054/jep.2018.21938.1807]
8. Gardner, H., & Moran, S. (2006). The science of multiple intelligences theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 227-232. [DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep4104_2]
9. Jenaabadi, H., & Haghgoo, B. (2015). Comparative study of thinking styles, creativity and self-esteem of gifted and normal high school students in Zahedan. Advances in Environmental Biology, 365-371.
10. Köksal, M. S., & Yel, M. (2007). The effect of multiple intelligences theory (MIT)-based instruction on attitudes towards the course, academic success, and permanence of teaching on the topic of" Respiratory Systems". Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 7(1), 231.
11. Phillips, H. (2010). Multiple intelligences: Theory and application. Perspectives In Learning, 11(1), 4.
12. Sharafati, A., Asadollah, S. B. H. S., & Neshat, A. (2020). A new artificial intelligence strategy for predicting the groundwater level over the Rafsanjan aquifer in Iran. Journal of Hydrology, 591, 125468. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125468]
13. Son, J.-W., & Diletti, J. (2017). What can we learn from textbook Analysis? What matters? Research trends in international comparative studies in mathematics education, 3-32. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-51187-0_1]
14. Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-based teaching and learning in Indonesian education. KnE Social Sciences, 76-89. [DOI:10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668]
15. Sulaiman, T., Abdurahman, A. R., & Rahim, S. S. A. (2010). Teaching strategies based on multiple intelligences theory among science and mathematics secondary school teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 512-518. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.070]
16. Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and science process skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135. [DOI:10.3926/jotse.404]
17. Yalmanci, S. G., & Gozum, A. I. C. (2013). The effects of multiple intelligence theory based teaching on students' achievement and retention of knowledge (example of the enzymes subject). International journal on new trends in education and their implications, 4(3), 27-36.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.