Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2023)
IEEPJ 2023, 5(2): 261-272 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahimi T, Rezaei A, Mehryar A H. (2023). Predicting Academic Performance based on Self-Regulated Learning Strategies: Mediating Role of High-Level Motivational and Cognitive Strategies. IEEPJ. 5(2), 261-272. doi:10.61186/ieepj.5.2.261
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-482-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-482-en.html
1- Educational Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University , Marvdasht, Iran.
2- Assistant professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University , Marvdasht, Iran. , javidih97@gmail.com
3- Professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University , Marvdasht, Iran.
2- Assistant professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University , Marvdasht, Iran. , javidih97@gmail.com
3- Professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University , Marvdasht, Iran.
Abstract: (855 Views)
The present study aimed to predict academic performance based on self-regulated learning strategies with the mediating role of high-level motivational and cognitive strategies. The research method was descriptive-correlation using structural equation modeling. The statistical population included all first grade high school students in Marvdasht (Iran) in 2020. Participants were 319 people whom selected via multi-stage cluster sampling method. Academic performance measured by Academic Performance Questionnaire (Pham & Taylor, 1999), self-regulated learning strategies assessed by Pintrich and de Groot (1990) Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), and high-level motivational and cognitive strategies evaluated by MSLQ and Biggs et al. (2001) Revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire. The structural equation analysis has been used to evaluate the hypothetical model. The results indicated the model benefited from the appropriate fit indices. Therefore, it can be concluded that self-regulated learning strategies indirectly and with the mediating role of high-level motivational and cognitive strategies, predict academic performance. The findings can be useful in the academic counseling and teachers' classroom affairs.
Keywords: Academic Performance, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, High Level Motivational and Cognitive Strategies, High School Students
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2021/12/27 | Accepted: 2022/03/3 | Published: 2023/06/1
Received: 2021/12/27 | Accepted: 2022/03/3 | Published: 2023/06/1
References
1. Abu Saa, A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Factors affecting students' performance in higher education: a systematic review of predictive data mining techniques. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 567-598. [DOI:10.1007/s10758-019-09408-7]
2. Afsharian, N., & Dortaj, F. (2016). Evaluation of the Factor Structure of "Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire"forIranian students. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6(23), 23-43. [DOI:10.22054/jem.2017.11267.1327]
3. Bai, B., Wang, J., & Nie, Y. (2021). Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: What has the most predictive power for primary school students' self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context? Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(1), 65-84. [DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1778639]
4. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revised two‐factor study process questionnaire: R‐SPQ‐2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133-149. [DOI:10.1348/000709901158433]
5. Cano, F., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2008). Family environment, epistemological beliefs, learning strategies, and academic performance: A path analysis. In Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 219-239). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_10]
6. Chen, C. (2002). Self-regulated learning strategies and regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information systems course. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 20(1), 11-25.
7. Diseth, Å., & Kobbeltvedt, T. (2010). A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 671-687. [DOI:10.1348/000709910X492432]
8. Habibi-Kaleybar, R. (2020). The Role of Perceptions of Class' Environment and Motivation for Academic Achievement in Predicting Students' Academic Satisfaction. Educational Development of Judishapur, 11(3), 323-333. [DOI:10.22118/edc.2020.223847.1289]
9. Mushtaq, I., & Khan, S. N. (2012). Factors affecting students' academic performance. Global journal of management and business research, 12(9), 17-22.
10. Núñez, J. C., Tuero, E., Fernández, E., Añón, F. J., Manalo, E., & Rosário, P. (2022). Efecto de una intervención en estrategias de autorregulación en el rendimiento académico en Primaria: estudio del efecto mediador de la actividad autorregulatoria. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 27(1), 9-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2017.07.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.psicod.2021.09.001]
11. Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250-260. [DOI:10.1177/0146167299025002010]
12. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 92(3), 544. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544]
13. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33]
14. Saffarieh, M., Rezaei, A. M., & Mohammadifar, M. A. (2022). Evaluation of validity and reliability of Pham and Taylor Academic Performance Questionnaire (1999). Educational Development of Judishapur, 13(0), 1-15. [DOI:10.22118/edc.2021.305873.1891]
15. Saheb Alzamani, M., & Zirak, A. (2011). Students' Learning and Study Strategies in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and their relationship with Test Anxiety [other]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(1), 58-68. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1662-fa.html
16. Samavi, A., Hajializadeh, K., Javdan, M., & Farshad, M. R. (2022). Psychometric validation of teacher empathy scale: Measurement invariance in gender. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1042993. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042993]
17. Samavi, S. A. (2022). positive psychology studies in education. In (Vol. 13, pp. 845199): Frontiers Media SA. [DOI:10.3389/978-2-88974-683-5]
18. Samavi, S. A., Javidi, H., Kazemi, S., & Bagholi, H. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Teaching Based on Flipped Learning on the Academic Achievement of Sixth-Grade Students. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 2(2), 89-97. [DOI:10.29252/ieepj.2.2.89]
19. Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher education, 31(1), 97-116. [DOI:10.1007/BF00129109]
20. Ward, R. T., & Butler, D. L. (2019). An investigation of metacognitive awareness and academic performance in college freshmen. Education, 139(3), 120-126.
21. Wu, H., Li, S., Zheng, J., & Guo, J. (2020). Medical students' motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical education online, 25(1), 1742964. [DOI:10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964]
22. Zhang, T., Tan, F., Yu, C., Wu, J., & Xu, J. (2023). Understanding relationship between topic selection and academic performance of scientific teams based on entity popularity trend. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(3), 561-588. [DOI:10.1108/AJIM-03-2022-0135]
23. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2004). Self-regulating intellectual processes and outcomes: A social cognitive perspective. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development, 323-349.
24. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 15-26.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
