Volume 7, Issue 1 (March 2025)
IEEPJ 2025, 7(1): 227-240 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Gheisarani S, Fooladchang M. (2025). Psychometric Indicators of Emotional Self-Regulation Strategies Questionnaire among Secondary School Students in Shiraz. IEEPJ. 7(1), 227-240. doi:10.22034/7.1.227
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-471-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-471-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. ,foolad@shirazu.ac.ir
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. ,
Abstract: (2038 Views)
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess and modify the validity and reliability indices of the March Emotional Self-Regulation Strategies Questionnaire for high school students in Shiraz.
Methods: The participants comprised 200 male and female secondary school students selected via convenience sampling during the 2021-2022 academic year. The primary research instrument was a 44-item questionnaire developed by Larsen and Pris, focusing on emotional self-regulation strategies.
Results: The factor structure of the instrument was subsequently validated through factor analysis. The reliability coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.68 to 0.83, determined by Cronbach's alpha method.
Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate that the Emotional Self-Regulation Questionnaire is effective in assessing this construct and its dimensions among high school students in Shiraz, addressing their evaluative needs.
Methods: The participants comprised 200 male and female secondary school students selected via convenience sampling during the 2021-2022 academic year. The primary research instrument was a 44-item questionnaire developed by Larsen and Pris, focusing on emotional self-regulation strategies.
Results: The factor structure of the instrument was subsequently validated through factor analysis. The reliability coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.68 to 0.83, determined by Cronbach's alpha method.
Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate that the Emotional Self-Regulation Questionnaire is effective in assessing this construct and its dimensions among high school students in Shiraz, addressing their evaluative needs.
Keywords: Emotional Self-Regulation Strategies Questionnaire, Psychometric Indicators, Validity, Reliability
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Evolutionary Psychology
Received: 2022/02/12 | Accepted: 2022/06/20 | Published: 2025/03/1
Received: 2022/02/12 | Accepted: 2022/06/20 | Published: 2025/03/1
References
1. Abasi, M., Begian, M., Ayadi, N., & Dargahi, S. (2015). Compare Self compassion, Cognitive Avoidance and Emotional Self-regulation in Students with and without Learning Disabilities. Quarterly Journal of Health Breeze, 4(1), 31-40. https://jfh.sari.iau.ir/article_651627_961a58b7a043967e2019124d98afcba1.pdf
2. Aflaki Fard, D. H., & Akbari, M. R. (2019). Relationship between time management and creativity and self-regulation of the students of the sixth elementary school of Saadabad. Quarterly Journal of Education Studies, 5(18), 69-90. https://researchbt.cfu.ac.ir/article_872_1ee162eb7a8f779de537b914966af9e6.pdf
3. Alarcón-Espinoza, M., Sanduvete-Chaves, S., Anguera, M. T., Samper Garcia, P., & Chacón-Moscoso, S. (2022). Emotional self-regulation in everyday life: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 884756. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884756]
4. Bembenutty, H. (2007). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of advanced academics, 18(4), 586-616. [DOI:10.4219/jaa-2007-553]
5. Crippen, K. J., Schraw, G., & Brooks, D. W. (2005). Using an interactive, compensatory model of learning to improve chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 637. [DOI:10.1021/ed082p637]
6. Daniela, P. (2015). The relationship between self-regulation, motivation and performance at secondary school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2549-2553. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.410]
7. HajShamsayi, M., Kareshki, H., & AmineYazdi, S. A. (2014). Testing the model of mediator role of self-regulation in relation between Classroom socio-mental climate and maladjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 3(3), 21-37. [DOI:jsp-3-3-2]
8. Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M., & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202-226. [DOI:10.1177/0013164404267287]
9. Karimi, M., & Farahbakhsh, K. (2012). Relationship between affective self-regulation and study skills with educational performance of students of Isfahan University of Medical Science [other]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(9), 1149-1161. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1991-fa.html
10. Kazemi, M., & Kazempoor Dehbidi, Z. (2022). Investigating the Relationship between Self-regulation and Self-control in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 4(3), 432-440. [DOI:10.52547/ieepj.4.3.432]
11. Kazemi, S., Sohrabi, N., Barzegar, M., & Poorgholamy, F. (2019). Testing the conceptual model of mediating role of self-regulation learning and achievement goals in the relationship between epistemological beliefs and academic burnout in the students of humanity science group in Shiraz Payame-noor University. Psychological Models and Methods, 10(36), 1-23. https://jpmm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_3602_11902ecf8fed6105cbb1c25f50a00c5b.pdf
12. Larsen, R. J., Prizmic, Z., Eid, M., & Larsen, R. (2008). Regulation of emotional well-being. The science of subjective well-being, 258-289.
13. Nazarpour Samsami, P., Ghasemzadeh, M., & Panahi, M. (2018). Comparing Emotion Regulation Strategies and Emotional Self-Regulation in 12-16 Year Old Boys with and without Drug-Addicted Parents in Masjed Soleyman [Research]. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research, 15(3), 113-126. http://qjfr.ir/article-1-777-fa.html
14. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407. [DOI:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x]
15. Ramani, G. B., Brownell, C. A., & Campbell, S. B. (2010). Positive and negative peer interaction in 3-and 4-year-olds in relation to regulation and dysregulation. The Journal of genetic psychology, 171(3), 218-250. [DOI:10.1080/00221320903300353]
16. Saberi Fard, F., & Hajiarbabi, F. (2019). The relationship between family emotional climate with emotional self-regulation and resilience in university's students [Research]. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 6(1), 49-63. [DOI:10.29252/shenakht.6.1.49]
17. Samavi, S. A., Javidi, H., Kazemi, S., & Bagholi, H. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Teaching Based on Flipped Learning on the Academic Achievement of Sixth-Grade Students. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 2(2), 89-97. [DOI:10.29252/ieepj.2.2.89]
18. Strongman, K. T. (2007). Applying psychology to everyday life: A beginner's guide. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Willoughby, M., Kupersmidt, J., Voegler-Lee, M., & Bryant, D. (2011). Contributions of hot and cool self-regulation to preschool disruptive behavior and academic achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(2), 162-180. [DOI:10.1080/87565641.2010.549980]
20. Zare, S., Zeinalipoor, H., & Naseri Jahromi, R. (2018). Study of the relationship between self-regulated learners strategies with academic achievement [Research]. Research in Medical Education, 9(4), 57-49. [DOI:10.29252/rme.9.4.57]
21. Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Huang, W. (2011). What makes them happy and curious online? An empirical study on high school students' Internet use from a self-determination theory perspective. Computers & Education, 56(2), 346-356. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.006]
22. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217-221. [DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8]
23. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82-91. [DOI:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
