Volume 4, Issue 4 (December 2022)
IEEPJ 2022, 4(4): 123-137 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Keramati M, Hamidnia F, Allahyari R. (2022). Classroom Leadership Based on Cooperative Approach versus Traditional Teaching Method Effects on the Social Skills and Academic Self-Efficacy. IEEPJ. 4(4), 123-137. doi:10.52547/ieepj.4.4.123
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-584-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-584-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Department of Management and Educational Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Master's student, Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , f.hamidnia061@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Educational Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Master's student, Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , f.hamidnia061@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Educational Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (901 Views)
This study main aimed to compare the effect of classroom leadership based on the cooperative approach and the traditional teaching method on the social skills and academic self-efficacy in fifth grade students of Ahvaz (Iran). The study design was a semi-experimental pre-test-post-test with a control group. Participants were 30 fifth grade students who were selected using the accessible sampling method and were randomly assigned to cooperative and traditional teaching groups (15 students in each group). Gresham and Elliott (1990) social skills questionnaire and Jinks and Morgan (1999) self-efficacy questionnaire were used to collect data. Cooperative learning method was designed based on the Ellis and Wallen (2007) approach and implemented in the cooperative teaching group. In the second group, the traditional method was performed in the usual way of classroom. Covariance analysis was used in SPSS-23 software to analyze the data. The results indicated that there was a significant difference between the classroom leadership based on the cooperative group and the traditional teaching group in the effectiveness of social skills and its dimensions in students (0.05 >P). Also, according to the findings, there was a significant difference between the two groups in academic self-efficacy and its dimensions (P<0.05). Based on the findings, it can be concluded that classroom leadership based on a cooperative approach compared to traditional method can lead to the more improvement of students' social skills and academic self-efficacy.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2022/09/21 | Accepted: 2022/11/1 | Published: 2022/12/1
Received: 2022/09/21 | Accepted: 2022/11/1 | Published: 2022/12/1
References
1. Altunsoy, S., Çimen, O., Ekici, G., Atik, A. D., & Gökmen, A. (2010). An assessment of the factors that influence biology teacher candidates' levels of academic self-efficacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2377-2382. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.340]
2. Aryanti, Y., & Widodo, E. (2020). The effectiveness of Student Team Achiement Divisions (STAD) cooperative learning in science learning on analysis skills and social skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 22-27. [DOI:10.21831/jser.v4i1.34237]
3. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
4. Cho, R. M. (2011). Understanding the mechanism behind maternal imprisonment and adolescent school dropout. Family Relations, 60(3), 272-289. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00649.x]
5. Daliri, E., Zeinaddiny Meymand, Z., Soltani, A., & Hajipour Abaei, N. (2021). Examining the Model of Academic Self-Efficacy Based on the Teacher-Student Relationship in High School Students. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal, 3(3), 247-255. [DOI:10.52547/ieepj.3.3.247]
6. Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (1996). Collaborative learning: improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental impact assessment review, 16(2), 71-102. [DOI:10.1016/0195-9255(96)00003-0]
7. Dogan, U. (2015). Student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 553-561. [DOI:10.1080/09720073.2015.11891759]
8. Elliott, S. N., Frey, J. R., & Davies, M. (2015). Systems for assessing and improving students' social skills to achieve academic competence.
9. Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (1987). Children's social skills: Assessment and classification practices. Journal of Counseling & Development, 66(2), 96-99. [DOI:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb00808.x]
10. Ellis, S. S., & Whalen, S. F. (1990). Cooperative learning: Getting started. Scholastic.
11. Emaliana, I. (2017). Teacher-centered or student-centered learning approach to promote learning? Jurnal Sosial Humaniora (JSH), 10(2), 59-70. [DOI:10.12962/j24433527.v10i2.2161]
12. Fernandez-Rio, J., Cecchini, J. A., Méndez-Gimenez, A., Mendez-Alonso, D., & Prieto, J. A. (2017). Self-regulation, cooperative learning, and academic self-efficacy: Interactions to prevent school failure. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 22. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00022]
13. Gul Mohammadnejad Bahrami, A. (2017). Comparison of the effectiveness of collaborative and traditional learning on communication skills and self-efficacy of second year high school female students. Education and Evaluation (Educational Sciences), 11(41), 39-58.
14. Huang, C. (2016). Achievement goals and self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 119-137. [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.002]
15. Jamali, M., Noroozi, A., & Tahmasebi, R. (2013). Factors Affecting Academic Self-Efficacy and Its Association with Academic Achievment among Students of Bushehr University Medical Sciences 2012-13 [Original research article]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(8), 629-641. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2638-fa.html
16. Jinks, J., & Morgan, V. (1999). Children's perceived academic self-efficacy: An inventory scale. The clearing house, 72(4), 224-230. [DOI:10.1080/00098659909599398]
17. Kalargyrou, V., Pescosolido, A. T., & Kalargiros, E. A. (2012). Leadership skills in management education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16(4), 39.
18. Kalmar, E., Aarts, T., Bosman, E., Ford, C., de Kluijver, L., Beets, J., . . . Koopman, J. (2022). The COVID-19 paradox of online collaborative education: when you cannot physically meet, you need more social interactions. Heliyon, 8(1), e08823. [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08823]
19. Karamati, M., Ansarizadeh, F., & Izan, M. (2018). The effect of classroom management based on a collaborative approach on the academic progress of science courses. Journal of Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 4(5), 37-48.
20. Keramati, M. (2020). The perception of undergraduate students in the field of counseling on cooperative learning in the classroom. Research in Teaching, 8(1), 1-18. https://trj.uok.ac.ir/article_61455_a886ab0bc23546756d92e9554bfd4cbb.pdf
21. Khalegkhah, A., oorojy, n., & najafi, h. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Participatory Learning on Individual Self-Efficacy and Student motivation With the Approach of Jig Saw. Journal of educational psychology, 11(4), -.
22. Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092]
23. Law, Q., So, H., & Chung, J. (2017). Effect of collaborative learning on enhancement of students' self-efficacy, social skills and knowledge towards mobile apps development. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 25-29.
24. Livarjani, S., Mohammadin, A., & Azmode, M. (2019). The Study of Self-efficacy, Social Anxiety and Psychological Hardiness Among High School Students with Different Levels of Happiness. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 12(46), 105-124. [DOI:10.30495/jinev.2019.668241]
25. Luszczynska, A., Schwarzer, R., Lippke, S., & Mazurkiewicz, M. (2011). Self-efficacy as a moderator of the planning-behaviour relationship in interventions designed to promote physical activity. Psychology and Health, 26(2), 151-166. [DOI:10.1080/08870446.2011.531571]
26. Mari, J., & Gumel, S. A. (2015). Effects of jigsaw model of cooperative learning on self-efficacy and achievement in chemistry among concrete and formal reasoners in colleges of education in Nigeria. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(3), 196. [DOI:10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.501]
27. McDaniel, S. C., Bruhn, A. L., & Troughton, L. (2017). A brief social skills intervention to reduce challenging classroom behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26, 53-74. [DOI:10.1007/s10864-016-9259-y]
28. Mehrmohammadi, M. (2016). Rethinking the teaching-learning process ( 4th ed.). School Publications.
29. Moradi, R. (2021). Effectiveness of Social Skills Training With Multimedia Instruction Methods on Social Adjustment of Students Mentally Disable [Research]. Journal of Exceptional Children, 21(3), 103-112. http://joec.ir/article-1-743-fa.html
30. O'Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and instruction, 48, 5-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003]
31. O'Donnell, A. M., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Introduction: What is collaborative learning?: An overview. The international handbook of collaborative learning, 1-15. [DOI:10.4324/9780203837290]
32. Peguero, A. A., & Shaffer, K. A. (2015). Academic self-efficacy, dropping out, and the significance of inequality. Sociological Spectrum, 35(1), 46-64. [DOI:10.1080/02732173.2014.978428]
33. Pisula, E., & Porębowicz-Dörsmann, A. (2017). Family functioning, parenting stress and quality of life in mothers and fathers of Polish children with high functioning autism or Asperger syndrome. PloS one, 12(10), e0186536. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186536]
34. Poellhuber, B., Chomienne, M., & Karsenti, T. (2008). The effect of peer collaboration and collaborative learning on self-efficacy and persistence in a learner-paced continuous intake model. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 22(3), 41-62.
35. Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L., Raelin, J., Reisberg, R., & Whitman, D. (2011). The effect of cooperative education on change in self-efficacy among undergraduate students: Introducing work self-efficacy. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 45(2), 17-35.
36. Rahayu, S., & Suningsih, A. (2018). The effects of type learning model numbered head together and think pair share. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 19-21. [DOI:10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.27]
37. Saadatee Shamir, A., Azimifar, A., & Zahmatkesh, Y. Z. (2020). Predicting the social responsibility based on organizational learning and classroom management in high school teachers. Scientific Journal of Social Psychology, 8(special letter), 189-198. https://psychology.ahvaz.iau.ir/article_680978_4bb3f8e32592ad34bbbdf6398670c972.pdf
38. Sabzevar, M., Liaghatdar, M., & Abedi, A. (2015). The comparison of social Skills components of primary students at without bag schools and public schools of Isfahan. New Educational Approaches, 10(1), 105-120.
39. Samavi, S. A. (2022). positive psychology studies in education. Frontiers in psychology, 13. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845199]
40. Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents' motivation. Academic motivation of adolescents, 2, 29-52.
41. Sebastian, J., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2019). Do organizational conditions influence teacher implementation of effective classroom management practices: Findings from a randomized trial. Journal of school psychology, 72, 134-149. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.008]
42. Shih, S.-S., & Alexander, J. M. (2000). Interacting effects of goal setting and self-or other-referenced feedback on children's development of self-efficacy and cognitive skill within the Taiwanese classroom. Journal of educational psychology, 92(3), 536. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.536]
43. Sieberer-Nagler, K. (2016). Effective classroom-management & positive teaching. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 163-172. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v9n1p163]
44. Slavin, R. E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social issues, 55(4), 647-663. [DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00140]
45. Vahab, M., Shahim, S., Jafari, S., & Oryadi Zanjani, M. M. (2012). The relation between receptive language development and social skills among 4-to-6 year-old Persian-speaking children. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences, 8(3), 454-465.
46. Van Ryzin, M. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2018). Cooperative learning in middle school: A means to improve peer relations and reduce victimization, bullying, and related outcomes. Journal of educational psychology, 110(8), 1192. [DOI:10.1037/edu0000265]
47. Vaughan, W. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement and attitude among students of color. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 359-364. [DOI:10.1080/00220670209596610]
48. Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Kanacri, B. P. L., Di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 158-162. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.010]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
