Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2022)                   Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology 2022, 4(3): 441-449 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Darenjani Shirazi F, Sohrabi N, Chin Aveh M. Comparing of Pathology and Family Integration within Process and Content Model in High and Low Resilience Families. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology 2022; 4 (3) :441-449
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-509-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran
Abstract:   (410 Views)
The aim of this study was to compare the pathology and family integration within the process and content model in high and low resilience families. The method of the current research is a descriptive survey and the statistical population includes 6000 parents of middle school students were living in Shiraz city in 2020. The sample size of the research was 361 people who were selected by accessible sampling method. Self-report family content scale (SFCS), self-report family process scale and Sixbey Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS) were used to collecting data. The data were analyzed using the MANOVA test. The results revealed that there is a significant difference between high and low resilience families in the subscales of job and education, time to be together, financial resources, physical appearance, social dignity and physical and mental health. According to the findings, coping skills, cohesion and mutual respect and religious belief, decision-making, problem solving and communication skills were higher in families with high resilience than families with low resilience. In general, the findings exhibited that there is a significant difference between high and low resilience families in family integrity.
Full-Text [PDF 454 kb]   (77 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Evolutionary Psychology
Received: 2022/03/21 | Accepted: 2022/05/7 | Published: 2022/09/1

References
1. Abdi, F., Banijamli, S., Ahadi, H., & Koushki, s. (2019). Psychometric properties of of Resilience scale (CD-RISC) among women's with breast cancer [Research]. rph, 13(2), 81-99. [DOI:10.52547/rph.13.2.81]
2. Alessandri, G., Eisenberg, N., Vecchione, M., Caprara, G. V., & Milioni, M. (2016). Ego-resiliency development from late adolescence to emerging adulthood: A ten-year longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 50, 91-102. [DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.004]
3. Black, K., & Lobo, M. (2008). A conceptual review of family resilience factors. Journal of family nursing, 14(1), 33-55. [DOI:10.1177/1074840707312237]
4. Happer, K., Brown, E. J., & Sharma-Patel, K. (2017). Children's resilience and trauma-specific cognitive behavioral therapy: Comparing resilience as an outcome, a trait, and a process. Child abuse & neglect, 73, 30-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.021]
5. Jahani, S., Sohrabi, N., & Samani, S. (2012). Comparison of family process and content in families with hyperactive and normal children Second National Conference on Psychology - Family Psychology, Tehran.
6. Miller, K. K., Brar, P., Brown, C., García-Huidobro, D., Shramko, M., & Svetaz, M. V. (2020). 29. Family Separation and Latinx Youth Health Outcomes: Understanding Risk and Opportunities for Resilience. Journal of adolescent health, 66(2), S16. [DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.032]
7. Morgan, T., Yang, S., Liu, B., & Cao, Y. (2020). A comparison of psychological resilience and related factors in Chinese firstborn and only children. Asian journal of psychiatry, 53, 102360. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102360]
8. Morote, R., Anyan, F., Las Hayas, C., Gabrielli, S., Zwiefka, A., Gudmundsdottir, D. G., Ledertoug, M. M., Olafsdottir, A. S., Izco-Basurko, I., & Fullaondo, A. (2020). Development and validation of the theory-driven School Resilience Scale for Adults: Preliminary results. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105589. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105589]
9. Nam, B., Kim, J. Y., DeVylder, J. E., & Song, A. (2016). Family functioning, resilience, and depression among North Korean refugees. Psychiatry research, 245, 451-457. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.063]
10. Patterson, J. M. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of marriage and family, 64(2), 349-360. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00349.x]
11. Sadat Hosseini, F., & Hosseinchari, M. (2013). The Survey of Validation and Reliability of Family Resiliency Scale. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 3(2), 181-209. https://fcp.uok.ac.ir/article_9624_9ea6c853a93e42246bb442b26958b6cd.pdf
12. Samani, S. (2005). Family Process and content Model: A Theoretical Model British Psychological Society & Social Psychology, Birmingham, UK.
13. Samani, S. (2011). Family process and content model: A contextual model for family studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2285-2292. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.446]
14. Siamak, S. (2010). Family types in the family process and content model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 727-732. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.173]
15. Simon, J. B., Murphy, J. J., & Smith, S. M. (2005). Understanding and fostering family resilience. The Family Journal, 13(4), 427-436. [DOI:10.1177/1066480705278724]
16. Sixbey, M. T. (2005). Development of the family resilience assessment scale to identify family resilience constructs. University of Florida.
17. Tahmassian, K., Mootabi, F., Chimeh, N., Anari, A., Anari, R., & Taheri Far, Z. (2017). Situation analysis of iranain families: Concept of healthy family, recognizing features of iranain healthy family and traumatic factors from the expert's view [Qualitative]. Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 15(8), 630-641. http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-3127-fa.html
18. Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1), 1-18. [DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00001.x]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb