Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2022)
IEEPJ 2022, 4(3): 410-421 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rafiei Taba Zavareh S E, Bagheri N, Sabet M. (2022). Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on Math Anxiety, Academic Motivation and Academic Buoyancy in High school Students. IEEPJ. 4(3), 410-421. doi:10.52547/ieepj.4.3.410
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-423-en.html
URL: http://ieepj.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-423-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Educational Psychology, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran
2- Department of Educational Psychology, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran , Bagheri.nas@gmail.com
3- Department of Educational Psychology, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran
2- Department of Educational Psychology, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran , Bagheri.nas@gmail.com
3- Department of Educational Psychology, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran
Abstract: (1503 Views)
The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness of cooperative learning on math anxiety, academic motivation and academic buoyancy in female high school students. The current research is a pretest-posttest follow-up semi experimental design with a control group. Participants were 30 students selected by purposive sampling and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Experimental group received cooperative learning intervention (math book contents) in 10 sessions in five weeks and control group was taught by using traditional method (lecture method) during this period. Data collection tools included Plake and Parker Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (1982), Harter Academic Motivation Scale (1981) and Hosseinchari and Dehghanizadeh Academic Buoyancy (2012). Analysis of variance with repeated measures and Bonferroni post hoc test were used to examine the hypotheses. The results indicated there is a significant difference between experimental and control group in math anxiety, motivation and academic buoyancy (P < .01). According to results, the cooperative learning improved motivation and academic buoyancy and reduced levels of math anxiety in experimental group. Consequently results supported the impact of cooperative learning in improving motivational outcomes and reducing the negative emotions in high school students.
Keywords: Cooperating learning, Math anxiety, Academic motivation, Academic buoyancy, High school students
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Educational Psychology
Received: 2021/11/17 | Accepted: 2022/03/18 | Published: 2022/09/1
Received: 2021/11/17 | Accepted: 2022/03/18 | Published: 2022/09/1
References
1. Aghajani, S., Khormaee, F., Rajabi, S., & Rostamoqli khiavi, Z. (2012). The relationship of self-esteem and self-efficacy to mathematical anxiety in students. Journal of School Psychology, 1(3), 6-26. [DOI:d_1_3_91_7_1_1]
2. Al‐Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking. British journal of educational technology, 46(6), 1133-1148. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.12353]
3. Amani Saribaglou, J., Vahedi, S., Fathi azar, E., & Abidi, L. (2019). The effect of reversed jigsaw classroom on university students' academic performance and statistics anxiety. Educational psychology, 15(52), 133-153. [DOI:10.22054/jep.2019.30599.2183]
4. Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2017). Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter? The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 29-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.002]
5. Bohrani, M. (2009). The study of validity and reliability of Harter's Scale of Educational Motivation.
6. Diani, A. H., & Dwijanto, D. (2020). Mathematical creative thinking ability observed from student learning motivation in Jigsaw Cooperative Learning assisted by problem cards. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 66-73.
7. Ebrahimi Bakht, H., Yarahamdi, Y., Asadzadeh, H., & Ahmadian, H. (2018). The effectiveness of academic vitality training program on academic performance, academic enthusiasm and academic vitality of students. Research in Teaching, 6(2), 163-182. https://trj.uok.ac.ir/article_60835_9ae0bf96f1842f6346eaea94303ce0c4.pdf
8. Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298-315. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.001]
9. Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017). The math anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon. Current directions in psychological science, 26(1), 52-58. [DOI:10.1177/0963721416672463]
10. Gill, A. C., Singhal, G., Schutze, G. E., & Turner, T. L. (2021). Educational Coaches: Facilitating Academic Vitality and a Pathway to Promotion for Clinician-Educators. The Journal of Pediatrics, 235, 3-5. e3. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.042]
11. Gredler, M. E. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: Is it too late? Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 113-131. [DOI:10.1007/s10648-011-9183-6]
12. Habibi-Kaleybar, R. (2018). Studing the effectiveness of teaching the thinking and research lesson in a collaborative way on creative thinking and reading skills of primary schools' sixth grade students. Thinking and Children, 8(2), 1-20. https://fabak.ihcs.ac.ir/article_4292_796bcfb5f84e2f887d9a265dcb56adb1.pdf
13. Hajhosseini, M., Kousheh, T., Gholamali Lavasani, M., & Morseli, M. (2017). The effect of cooperative learning on anxiety, attitude and academic achievement in math. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 7(4), 117-132. [DOI:10.22059/japr.2017.61084]
14. Hajihoseinlou, K., Khaleghkhah, A., Zahedbabolan, A., & Moenikia, M. (2017). The Effect of Cooperative Learning with Achievement Groups on Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept of Student's Mathematics. Educational psychology, 13(43), 119-139. [DOI:10.22054/jep.2017.7764]
15. Harter, S., & Jackson, B. K. (1992). Trait vs. nontrait conceptualizations of intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation. Motivation and emotion, 16(3), 209-230. [DOI:10.1007/BF00991652]
16. Hassanalizadehroashan, S., Alaf Asghari, F., Mohamadzadeh admalaii, R. a., Najafipoor tabestanagh, A., & Savabi niri, V. (2022). The effect of participatory learning on academic motivation, procrastination and academic vitality of high school students in Babol [Applicable]. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal(RRJ), 10(10), 287-297. http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-3025-fa.html
17. Jameson, M. M., & Fusco, B. R. (2014). Math anxiety, math self-concept, and math self-efficacy in adult learners compared to traditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(4), 306-322. [DOI:10.1177/0741713614541461]
18. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15-29. [DOI:10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8]
19. Leila Abdolmaleki, Majid Safarinia, Hossein Zare, & Borzoo Amirpour. (2013). Psychometric properties of the bidimensional Mathematics Anxiety Scale-Revised (MAS-R) on girl students [Original]. Pajoohande, 18(3), 122-127. http://pajoohande.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1544-fa.html
20. Lopes, J., Silva, H., Catarino, P., Morais, E., & Vasco, P. (2019). Cooperative learning on promoting creative thinking and mathematical creativity in higher education. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educacion, 17(3), 5-22.
21. Marashi, H., & Khatami, H. (2017). Using cooperative learning to boost creativity and motivation in language learning. Journal of Language and Translation, 7(1), 43-58.
22. Murat, P. (2016). Mathematics teaching anxiety and self-efficacy beliefs toward mathematics teaching: A path analysis. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(3), 97-104. [DOI:10.5897/ERR2015.2552]
23. Rump, M., Esdar, W., & Wild, E. (2017). Individual differences in the effects of academic motivation on higher education students' intention to drop out. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(4), 341-355. [DOI:10.1080/21568235.2017.1357481]
24. Senobar, A., Kasir, S., TaghaviNasab, A., & Raeisi, E. (2018). The role of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies, academic optimism and academic engagement in predicting academic vitality of nursing students. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 149-155.
25. Sepehrianazar, F., & Babaee, A. (2014). Structural equation modeling of relationship between mathematics anxieties with parenting styles: The meditational role of goal orientation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 607-612. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.251]
26. Sever, E., & Akyol, H. (2022). The Impact of Collaborative Learning Techniques on Written Expression, Self-Regulation and Writing Motivation. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(5), 587-603. [DOI:10.26822/iejee.2022.265]
27. Suárez-Pellicioni, M., Núñez-Peña, M. I., & Colomé, À. (2016). Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(1), 3-22. [DOI:10.3758/s13415-015-0370-7]
28. Wang, Z., Lukowski, S. L., Hart, S. A., Lyons, I. M., Thompson, L. A., Kovas, Y., Mazzocco, M. M., Plomin, R., & Petrill, S. A. (2015). Is math anxiety always bad for math learning? The role of math motivation. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1863-1876. [DOI:10.1177/0956797615602471]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
