Volume 3, Issue 3 (September 2021)                   IEEPJ 2021, 3(3): 345-356 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- PhD in Curriculum Planning, Farhangian University, Isfahan, Iran , parisav@ymail.com
2- Associate Professor of Curriculum Planning, Markazi Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2806 Views)
The present paper is qualitative and interpretive study that uses the strategy of phenomenological research to explain the experience of high school students in flipped classroom; therefore, the analysis unit of the present study includes all the eleventh grade students of the art school who have been trained in the eleventh grade of 96-97 academic year; fifteen students are considered as a sample. The data collection tool is an in-depth interview which is analyzed based on the thematic method of in-text approach. Findings show that the majority of students are satisfied with the implementation of this method; dissatisfaction is related to problems of student, teacher performance and inappropriate context. Also, the advantages of this method are deep learning and the possibility of re-learning at home, and discussion in the classroom.
Full-Text [PDF 464 kb]   (390 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Educational Psychology
Received: 2021/04/12 | Accepted: 2021/08/11 | Published: 2021/09/1

References
1. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [DOI:10.18260/1-2--22585]
2. Chilingaryan, K., & Zvereva, E. (2017). Methodology of flipped classroom as a learning technology in foreign language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 1500-1504. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.236]
3. Little, C. (2015). The flipped classroom in further education: literature review and case study. Research in post-compulsory education, 20(3), 265-279. [DOI:10.1080/13596748.2015.1063260]
4. Love, B., Hodge, A., Corritore, C., & Ernst, D. C. (2015). Inquiry-based learning and the flipped classroom model. Primus, 25(8), 745-762. [DOI:10.1080/10511970.2015.1046005]
5. McNally, B., Chipperfield, J., Dorsett, P., Del Fabbro, L., Frommolt, V., Goetz, S., . . . Reddan, G. (2017). Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. Higher Education, 73(2), 281-298. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-016-0014-z]
6. Owoyele, J. (2011). Causal Attributions and Affective Reactions to Academic Failure Among Undergraduates In The Nigerian Premier Uni. European Journal of Scientific Research, 52(3), 406-412.
7. Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International review of economics education, 17, 74-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003]
8. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning environments research, 15(2), 171-193. [DOI:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4]
9. Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy: Routledge.
10. Wallace, A. (2013). Social learning platforms and the flipped classroom. Paper presented at the 2013 Second International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education (ICEEE). [DOI:10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644373]
11. Zang, X. (2016). The application of flipped classroom in English grammar teaching in second high school. Paper presented at the The International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Educatio. [DOI:10.2991/icadce-16.2016.350]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.