Volume 2, Issue 1 (March 2020)                   Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology 2020, 2(1): 1-12 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

1- Phd Student, Department of Educational Sciences,University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas
2- Department of Educational Sciences, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas
3- Department of Counselling, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas
Abstract:   (1512 Views)
The purpose of this study was to design a higher education curriculum framework based on Connectivism approach. This is a qualitative research in terms of design, and a descriptive-analytical one in terms of methodology. The statistical population consisted of all digital documents, articles, and books related to Connectivism Theory from 2005 to 2017, out of which 120 valid sources were identified and ranked based on the degree of relevance to the research topic. Code extraction began from the most relevant sources and continued until the theoretical data saturation which was obtained after reviewing 30 articles. To validate the proposed curriculum framework, the viewpoints of 5 experts who were selected through Purposeful Sampling were sued in classic Delphi method. To this end, the experts reviewed and modified the proposed framework and eliminated its flaws and ambiguities in three phases and finally, the desired framework was developed. After reviewing the documents related to the Connectivism approach through a descriptive-analytical method, the curriculum was discovered based on this approach and then it was developed within the Nine Elements of Klein`s Curriculum (1992) including Objectives, Content, Teaching-Learning Strategies, Learning Material & Resources, Learners` Learning Activities, Time, Learning Space, Learners` Grouping, and Evaluation methods.
Full-Text [PDF 301 kb]   (963 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Educational Psychology
Received: 2019/06/20 | Accepted: 2019/10/25 | Published: 2020/03/26

1. Abedi, B., Baradaran, M., Khosravipour, B., & Ghanian, M. (2013). Identifying the Viewpoints of Faculty Members of Higher Education Centers for Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources on the Components of the Curriculum System. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 3, 4, 59-77.
2. Attaran, M., Ayati, M., & Kiamanesh, A. (2006). Theoretical Framework of Teacher Training Curricula in the Age of ICT. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1, 3, 105-133.
3. Drexler, W. (2010). The Networked Student Model for Construction of Personal Learning Environments: Balancing Teacher Control and Student Autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 3, 369-385. [DOI:10.14742/ajet.1081]
4. Fathi Vajargah, K. (2009). Principles and Concepts of Curriculum". Tehran: Elm-e-Ostadan Publication, 5 Edition.
5. Fenoglio, P J. (2006). 'Pinball' engagement and Connectivism: New understandings of learning in the 21st Century. Retrieved from https://exportquality.net/ESSAYS/PinballEngagement&Connectivism.pdf
6. Haghighat, M.N. (2012). The Role of the Media in National Education and Lifelong Learning, Ettelaat Newspaper, 25555, 25.
7. Iqbal, M. J. (2014). Life Long Education: A Conceptual Debate. International Journal of Media. Technology & Life Long Learning, 10, 2, 107-117.
8. Maleki, H., Mohammadimehr, M., & Khoshdel, A. (2012). Explaining the Teaching-Learning Process in GMC (general Medicine Course) Curriculum with Lifelong Learning Approach. Journal of Educational Studies, 1, 19-25.
9. Mohammadi Mehr, M. Maleki, H. Abbaspour, A. Khoshdel, A. (2011). The Role of Higher Education in Lifelong Learning, Journal of Educational Strategies, 4, 2, 91-94.
10. Mohammadi, M., Marzooqi, R., Torkzadeh, J., Salimi, Q., & Haddadnia, S. (2016). Higher Education Curriculum Based on Lifelong Learning Approach- Qualitative Approach. Journals of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 7,13, 37-77.
11. Morse, J. M. (1994). "Emerging from the data": The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication, 1 Edition.
12. Pettenati, M. C., & Cigognini, M. E. (2010). Social networking theories and tools to support connectivist learning activities. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2, 3, 42-60. [DOI:10.4018/jwltt.2007070103]
13. Pourshafei, H. (2010). Continuing Learning in Sustainable Education Strategy. Journal of Researchers, 13, 7.
14. Seraji, F., Ataran, M., & Naderi, E. (2014). Curriculum Design for Virtual University, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 43-75.
15. Shahamat, N. (2015), An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Structures in Higher Education. Journal of A New Approach to Educational Management, 6, 23, 165-182.
16. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for a digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 1, 1-13.
17. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge. Vancouver, Bc: Lulu. Retrieved from http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wikis/KnowingKnowledge/index.php/Main_Page.
18. Siemens, G. (2008). What is the unique idea in Connectivism. Retrieved from http://www.connectivism.ca.
19. Siemens, G. (2009). Complexity, Chaos and Emergence. Retrieved from: https://docs. Google . Com / document/d/1SbKRX97 g1tVgxE3gVWIvA8injDYe_9JVwGjYCLzXe3k /edit.
20. Siemens, G. (2010). Networks, ecologies, and curatorial teaching. Retrieved from http://www. connectivism. Ca p 93.
21. Zeinoddini Meymand., Z. Naderi., E. Shari'atmadari., A. & Seif Naraqi, M. (2010). "Providing a Curriculum Development Guide Model Based on the Assessment of knowledge of Faculty Members of Islamic Azad University of Kerman Branch about the Pillars of Curriculum", Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, 4, 4, 99-128.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.